Re: HTTP/QUIC Diverging from HTTP/2

thanks for that.

Yes, the whole meta discussion about why / benefits etc can influence 
adoption pressure, and decisions around whether we should support it or 
block it.

Cheers

Adrien


------ Original Message ------
From: "Martin Thomson" <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
To: "Adrien de Croy" <adrien@qbik.com>
Cc: "Mike Bishop" <Michael.Bishop@microsoft.com>; "quic@ietf.org" 
<quic@ietf.org>; "HTTP working group mailing list" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Sent: 10/03/2017 4:12:48 PM
Subject: Re: HTTP/QUIC Diverging from HTTP/2

>On 10 March 2017 at 13:59, Adrien de Croy <adrien@qbik.com> wrote:
>>  for the benefit of those of us who maybe aren't so familiar with 
>>QUIC, are
>>  there any good resources you can refer us to which deal with the 
>>bigger
>>  picture such as why even have QUIC?
>
>
>This probably isn't the place for that discussion.  I would recommend
>reading the drafts.  They aren't complete, but you will gain some
>appreciation for what is going on.  Think about this in terms of
>replacing TCP, not HTTP.  There are higher level things around, like
>this old presentation:
>https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1T9GtMz1CvPpZtmF8g-W7j9XHZBOCp9cu1fW0sMsmpoo

Received on Friday, 10 March 2017 03:19:43 UTC