- From: Tom Bergan <tombergan@chromium.org>
- Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2017 12:41:18 -0800
- To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CA+3+x5E26beOT0CQYvt1LmQXmZBG3i9+H0g9-hqGgE_OCofNeg@mail.gmail.com>
> Applications sometimes want requests to be retried by > infrastructure, but can't easily express them in a non-idempotent > request (such as GET). nit: did you mean "in an idempotent request (such as GET)"? > A client SHOULD NOT automatically retry a failed automatic retry. Why does RFC 7230 say this? I am aware of HTTP clients that completely ignore this suggestion, and I can't offhand think of a reason why this is a good rule-of-thumb to follow. On Wed, Feb 1, 2017 at 12:26 AM, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote: > FYI; fairly minor update. Would love to hear what people think about the > various suggested paths forward. > > Cheers, > > > > Begin forwarded message: > > *From: *internet-drafts@ietf.org > *Subject: **New Version Notification for > draft-nottingham-httpbis-retry-01.txt* > *Date: *1 February 2017 at 7:25:43 pm AEDT > *To: *"Mark Nottingham" <mnot@mnot.net> > > > A new version of I-D, draft-nottingham-httpbis-retry-01.txt > has been successfully submitted by Mark Nottingham and posted to the > IETF repository. > > Name: draft-nottingham-httpbis-retry > Revision: 01 > Title: Retrying HTTP Requests > Document date: 2017-02-01 > Group: Individual Submission > Pages: 18 > URL: https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft- > nottingham-httpbis-retry-01.txt > Status: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-nottingham- > httpbis-retry/ > Htmlized: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-nottingham-httpbis- > retry-01 > Diff: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft- > nottingham-httpbis-retry-01 > > Abstract: > HTTP allows requests to be automatically retried under certain > circumstances. This draft explores how this is implemented, > requirements for similar functionality from other parts of the stack, > and potential future improvements. > > > > > Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of > submission > until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. > > The IETF Secretariat > > > -- > Mark Nottingham https://www.mnot.net/ > >
Received on Wednesday, 1 February 2017 20:41:54 UTC