- From: Tom Bergan <tombergan@chromium.org>
- Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2017 14:42:48 -0800
- To: Alex Rousskov <rousskov@measurement-factory.com>
- Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Received on Friday, 17 February 2017 22:43:23 UTC
On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 2:15 PM, Alex Rousskov < rousskov@measurement-factory.com> wrote: > On 02/17/2017 03:06 PM, Tom Bergan wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 5:21 PM, Alex Rousskov wrote: > > On 02/15/2017 04:43 PM, Tom Bergan wrote: > > > if the cache does not have an allowed ETag, then the > > > request should be forwarded to the origin. Does that sound right? > > > > It sounds reasonable to me but it would violate the original RFC 2616 > > text and go against the letter (but perhaps not the intent) of the > new > > HTTPbis rules. > > > > I don't think it would violate the original RFC 2616 text? > > > AFAICT, it would violate the following RFC 2616 Section 14.24 MUST: > > > If none of the entity tags match [...] > > the server [...] > > MUST return a 412 (Precondition Failed) response. > > A [caching] proxy is a server. > Ah yes, you're right.
Received on Friday, 17 February 2017 22:43:23 UTC