- From: Kari Hurtta <hurtta-ietf@elmme-mailer.org>
- Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2017 20:18:12 +0200 (EET)
- To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
- CC: Kari Hurtta <hurtta-ietf@elmme-mailer.org>, HTTP working group mailing list <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>: (Tue Jan 3 01:26:26 2017) > (Sorry about the delay, it's silly season here and I've been offline.) > > On 23 December 2016 at 18:58, Kari Hurtta <hurtta-ietf@elmme-mailer.org> wrote: > > Hmm. I need rephrase. Sorry for duplicate mail. > > > > Question is that well-known URI need to requested from all putative > > alternatives or not?. Yes, you can not request that from clear text > > connection now. > > > See: https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/pull/279 > > I am open to arguments that require that the check is performed every > time, but that's less flexible. This seems preferable. So answer to my question: | In other words is there requirement that given alternative service | is tested ? is that Alternative service does not be need to be tested for http: -scheme support (only some (= first) alternative service for that origin need to be tested. ) ( Client have possibility to test alternative service if client considers that usefull. ) / Kari Hurtta
Received on Tuesday, 3 January 2017 18:18:50 UTC