Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7540 (4925)

On 7 February 2017 at 15:07, Mark Nottingham <> wrote:
> Folks, please have a look at this and confirm that this is the intent.

Note that after reading Scott's last email, I've made a small tweak to
what I proposed originally (that is, the priority of many streams can
be affected).

> Martin, I'm assuming the status we want is HOLD FOR DOCUMENT UPDATE?


p.s., I think that it's awesome that these emails go to
mailto:text/ and

Received on Tuesday, 7 February 2017 04:11:33 UTC