xml-dist-app@w3.org from February 2002 by author

Andrew Layman

RE: Issue 133: SOAP and Web Architecture: Draft sentences for HTTP bi nding preamble. (Saturday, 23 February)
RE: Issue 133: SOAP and Web Architecture: Draft sentences for HTTP bi nding preamble. (Saturday, 23 February)
RE: Soap Message Canonicalization (SM-C14N) (Sunday, 17 February)
RE: SOAP Encoding and Schema (Sunday, 17 February)
RE: Issue with soap-rpc:result (Sunday, 17 February)
RE: Soap Message Canonicalization (SM-C14N) (Sunday, 17 February)
RE: SOAP Encoding: Default values (Sunday, 17 February)
Possibly defaulted (was RE: Minutes for Thurs 7th Feb 2002 Telcon) (Friday, 8 February)
RE: Issue with soap-rpc:result (Friday, 8 February)
RE: Issue with soap-rpc:result (Thursday, 7 February)
RE: Issue with encodingStyle (Thursday, 7 February)
RE: Issue with encodingStyle (Thursday, 7 February)

Asir S Vedamuthu

ETF: Proposed Resolution for Issue 184 (Thursday, 21 February)
Re: SOAP Encoding multistructs (Wednesday, 20 February)
ETF: Telecon Minutes, Tuesday Feb 19th 2002 (Wednesday, 20 February)
Re: Proposal for issue 78: RPC structs and Encoding root attribute (Tuesday, 19 February)
[Issue] XML Legacy Types in SOAP Encoding Schema (Tuesday, 12 February)
[Issue] Status of SOAP 1.2 Encoding Schema (Tuesday, 12 February)
ETF: Proposed Resolution for Issue #163 (Tuesday, 12 February)
ETF: Proposed Resolution for Issue #167 (Tuesday, 12 February)

bill palmer

FYI - possibly typographical errors (Wednesday, 6 February)

Bob Cunnings

RE: Issue with encodingStyle (Thursday, 7 February)
Re: Issue with encodingStyle (Wednesday, 6 February)

Champion, Mike

RE: Issue 133, and permitting no body (Monday, 4 February)

Christopher Ferris

Re: Issue 182: Fault Code restriction: "At Most One Fault Proposal" (Thursday, 21 February)
Re: XMLP/XMLE Use cases and processing models (Thursday, 21 February)
Re: Issue 182: Fault Code restriction: "At Most One Fault Proposal" (Thursday, 21 February)
Re: Soap Message Canonicalization (SM-C14N) (Monday, 18 February)
Re: Soap Message Canonicalization (SM-C14N) (Friday, 15 February)
oops! Re: Resolving the ednote in part 1 section 5.1 (Friday, 15 February)
Re: Resolving the ednote in part 1 section 5.1 (Friday, 15 February)
Re: TBTF: Proposed resolution issue 179 (Tuesday, 12 February)
Re: Proposal for resolution of issue 176 (Tuesday, 12 February)
Re: Proposal for resolution of issue 176 (Tuesday, 12 February)
Re: Proposal for resolution of issue 176 (Monday, 11 February)
Re: Proposal for resolution of issue 176 (Monday, 11 February)
Re: Proposal for resolution of issue 176 (Monday, 11 February)
TBTF: revised proposed resolution for i178 (Friday, 8 February)
Re: Proposed rewrite of Part 1, section 2 (long) (Wednesday, 6 February)
Re: TBTF: security considerations proposed text (Tuesday, 5 February)
TBTF: proposal for issue #57 (Tuesday, 5 February)
TBTF: proposed resolution for i178 (Tuesday, 5 February)
TBTF: security considerations proposed text (Monday, 4 February)
Re: TBTF: SOAP MEP vs TMEP (Monday, 4 February)
Re: Who Faulted (was RE: Proposed rewrite of Part 1, section 2 (l ong) ) (Friday, 1 February)

CSC@w3.org

�� (Saturday, 9 February)

David E. Cleary

RE: Issue with soap-rpc:result (Wednesday, 6 February)

David Orchard

RE: XMLP/XMLE Use cases and processing models (Wednesday, 20 February)
RE: XMLP/XMLE Use cases and processing models (Wednesday, 20 February)
RE: XMLP/XMLE Use cases and processing models (Tuesday, 19 February)
RE: XMLP/XMLE Use cases and processing models (Saturday, 16 February)
RE: XMLP/XMLE Use cases and processing models (Wednesday, 13 February)
RE: XMLP/XMLE Use cases and processing models (Wednesday, 13 February)
XMLP/XMLE Use cases and processing models (Wednesday, 6 February)

dirkx@covalent.net

CFP: O'Reilly Open Source Convention XML (II). (Monday, 18 February)

Don Box

RE: Proposal for issue 78: RPC structs and Encoding root attribute (Thursday, 28 February)
RE: Issue with encodingStyle (Sunday, 24 February)
RE: Reflective systems (Sunday, 24 February)
RE: Issue with soap-rpc:result (Thursday, 7 February)
RE: Issue with soap-rpc:result (Thursday, 7 February)
RE: Issue with soap-rpc:result (Thursday, 7 February)
RE: Issue with soap-rpc:result (Thursday, 7 February)

Eastlake III Donald-LDE008

RE: XMLP/XMLE Use cases and processing models (Monday, 25 February)

Eugene Kuznetsov

RE: XMLP/XMLE Use cases and processing models (Friday, 22 February)

Fred Carter

Re: Soap Message Canonicalization (SM-C14N) (Thursday, 21 February)

Glen Daniels

Issue #44 : proposed closing text (Tuesday, 19 February)
Issue 33 : Proposed resolution (Friday, 15 February)

Handoko

SOAP & WSDL tutorial (Saturday, 23 February)

Henrik Frystyk Nielsen

RE: Issue 182: Fault Code restriction: "At Most One Fault Proposa l" (Saturday, 23 February)
RE: Soap Message Canonicalization (SM-C14N) (Saturday, 23 February)
RE: Issue 182: Fault Code restriction: "At Most One Fault Proposal" (Saturday, 23 February)
RE: Issue 182: Fault Code restriction: "At Most One Fault Proposal" (Saturday, 23 February)
RE: Issue 182: Fault Code restriction: "At Most One Fault Proposal" (Thursday, 21 February)
RE: Issue 182: Fault Code restriction: "At Most One Fault Proposal" (Thursday, 21 February)
RE: Soap Message Canonicalization (SM-C14N) (Thursday, 21 February)
RE: Issue 182: Fault Code restriction: "At Most One Fault Proposal" (Thursday, 21 February)
RE: Soap Message Canonicalization (SM-C14N) (Thursday, 21 February)
RE: Soap Message Canonicalization (SM-C14N) (Wednesday, 20 February)
RE: Soap Message Canonicalization (SM-C14N) (Wednesday, 20 February)
RE: Soap Message Canonicalization (SM-C14N) (Wednesday, 20 February)
Proposal for resolving issue 180 (Tuesday, 19 February)
ETF and editors: Issue 17 and 48: Proposal for describing when to use SOAP encoding (Tuesday, 19 February)
RE: Issue 133: SOAP and Web Architecture: Draft sentences for HTTP bi nding preamble. (Monday, 18 February)
RE: SOAP Encoding: Default values (Monday, 18 February)
RE: New Issue: Fault Code Restrictions (Saturday, 16 February)
Proposed resolution for issue 103 (Saturday, 16 February)
RE: Soap Message Canonicalization (SM-C14N) (Friday, 15 February)
RE: Resolving the ednote in part 1 section 5.1 (Thursday, 14 February)
Resolving the ednote in part 1 section 5.1 (Wednesday, 13 February)
RE: TBTF: Proposed resolution issue 179 (Tuesday, 12 February)
RE: New issue: Default values of SOAP header block attributes (Tuesday, 12 February)
Issues 16 and 113: Proposed resolution (Tuesday, 12 February)
RE: Proposal for resolution of issue 176 (Tuesday, 12 February)
RE: Proposal for resolution of issue 176 (Tuesday, 12 February)
Issue 55: Proposed resolution (Tuesday, 12 February)
RE: Proposal for resolution of issue 176 (Monday, 11 February)
Proposal for resolution of issue 176 (Monday, 11 February)
New issue: Default values of SOAP header block attributes (Sunday, 10 February)
RE: RPC Mapping (Friday, 8 February)
RE: RPC Mapping (Friday, 8 February)
RE: Issue 177: missing elements same as nils? (Wednesday, 6 February)
Issue 177: missing elements same as nils? (Wednesday, 6 February)
XML name encoding examples (Monday, 4 February)
RE: DIME and SOAP in DIME specs submitted as IETF Internet Drafts (Monday, 4 February)
DIME and SOAP in DIME specs submitted as IETF Internet Drafts (Saturday, 2 February)
RE: Issue 133, and permitting no body (Friday, 1 February)
RE: Who Faulted (was RE: Proposed rewrite of Part 1, section 2 (l ong) ) (Friday, 1 February)

Hugo Haas

Re: Issue 133: SOAP and The Web Architecture (Friday, 1 February)

Ibhar Software

help !!! (Thursday, 21 February)

Jacek Kopecky

Draft resolution for issue 59 (Friday, 22 February)
RE: Issue with soap-rpc:result (Friday, 22 February)
Re: SOAP Encoding multistructs (Wednesday, 20 February)
SOAP Encoding multistructs (Wednesday, 20 February)
ETF's proposal for issue 78: RPC structs and Encoding root attribute (Wednesday, 20 February)
Re: ETF and editors: Issue 17 and 48: Proposal for describing when to use SOAP encoding (Tuesday, 19 February)
Re: Proposal for issue 78: RPC structs and Encoding root attribute (Tuesday, 19 February)
Re: Proposal for issue 78: RPC structs and Encoding root attribute (Tuesday, 19 February)
Proposal for issue 78: RPC structs and Encoding root attribute (Monday, 18 February)
Re: RPC/Encoding dependency (Monday, 18 February)
Re: RPC/Encoding dependency (Monday, 18 February)
RE: Issue with soap-rpc:result (Friday, 15 February)
RE: Issue with soap-rpc:result (Friday, 15 February)
RE: Issue with soap-rpc:result (Friday, 15 February)
RE: Issue with soap-rpc:result (Friday, 15 February)
RE: Issue with soap-rpc:result (Friday, 15 February)
RE: Issue with soap-rpc:result (Thursday, 14 February)
Re: Possibly defaulted (was RE: Minutes for Thurs 7th Feb 2002 Telcon) (Wednesday, 13 February)
RE: Issue with soap-rpc:result (Wednesday, 13 February)
Re: Issue with soap-rpc:result (Tuesday, 12 February)
Re: Updated Proposal for Rewrite of Part 1 Section 2 (Tuesday, 12 February)
Re: Possibly defaulted (was RE: Minutes for Thurs 7th Feb 2002 Telcon) (Tuesday, 12 February)
Re: RPC/Encoding dependency (Tuesday, 12 February)
Re: RPC Mapping (Tuesday, 12 February)
RE: Issue with soap-rpc:result (Tuesday, 12 February)
RE: Issue with soap-rpc:result (Tuesday, 12 February)
RE: Issue with soap-rpc:result (Friday, 8 February)
RE: Issue with soap-rpc:result (Friday, 8 February)
RE: Issue with encodingStyle (Thursday, 7 February)
RE: Issue with soap-rpc:result (Thursday, 7 February)
RE: Issue with soap-rpc:result (Thursday, 7 February)
Re: Issue with soap-rpc:result (Wednesday, 6 February)
Re: Issue 177: missing elements same as nils? (Wednesday, 6 February)
Re: SOAP Encoding - Arrays (Wednesday, 6 February)
array dimension zero? (Tuesday, 5 February)
Re: SOAP Encoding - Arrays (Tuesday, 5 February)
Re: SOAP Encoding - Arrays (Friday, 1 February)

Jean-Jacques Moreau

Re: Issue 182: Fault Code restriction: "At Most One Fault Proposal" (Thursday, 21 February)
Re: Issue 133: SOAP and Web Architecture: Draft sentences for HTT P binding preamble. (Thursday, 21 February)
Re: Issue 133: SOAP and Web Architecture: Draft sentences for HTTP bi nding preamble. (Wednesday, 20 February)
Re: Proposal for resolution of issue 176 (Tuesday, 12 February)
Re: Proposal for resolution of issue 176 (Tuesday, 12 February)
Re: New issue: Default values of SOAP header block attributes (Tuesday, 12 February)
Re: Email binding (Friday, 8 February)
Re: Email binding (Friday, 8 February)
Re: XMLP/XMLE Use cases and processing models (Wednesday, 6 February)
Re: NOTATION attribute invalid in soap-encoding (Wednesday, 6 February)
Re: NOTATION attribute invalid in soap-encoding (Tuesday, 5 February)
Re: NOTATION attribute invalid in soap-encoding (Tuesday, 5 February)
Re: TBTF: security considerations proposed text (Tuesday, 5 February)
Re: DIME and SOAP in DIME specs submitted as IETF Internet Drafts (Monday, 4 February)
Re: Who Faulted (was RE: Proposed rewrite of Part 1, section 2 (l ong) ) (Friday, 1 February)
Re: Who Faulted (was RE: Proposed rewrite of Part 1, section 2 (l ong) ) (Friday, 1 February)
Re: Who Faulted (was RE: Proposed rewrite of Part 1, section 2 (l ong) ) (Friday, 1 February)

John Ibbotson

Issue 51: Support different message patterns (Friday, 22 February)

John J. Barton

RE: Issue 133, and permitting no body (Wednesday, 6 February)
Re: Reflective systems (Wednesday, 6 February)
Re: Issue 133, and permitting no body (Wednesday, 6 February)
Re: Reflective systems (Tuesday, 5 February)

Joseph Reagle

Re: XMLP/XMLE Use cases and processing models (Tuesday, 19 February)
Re: XMLP/XMLE Use cases and processing models (Thursday, 7 February)
Re: XMLP/XMLE Use cases and processing models (Wednesday, 6 February)

Kirill Gavrylyuk

ANN: Microsoft contribution to SOAP 1.2 test collection (Friday, 22 February)

Kurt Cagle

Re: Reflective systems (Tuesday, 5 February)

Larry Masinter

RE: Issue 133: SOAP and Web Architecture: Draft sentences for HTTP binding preamble. (Sunday, 24 February)
FYI: BCP 56, RFC 3205 on HTTP Layering (Thursday, 14 February)

Marc Hadley

Revised Issue 137 Proposed Resolution (Thursday, 28 February)
Issue 154: Role invariance - proposed resolution (Friday, 22 February)
Re: ETF and editors: Issue 17 and 48: Proposal for describing when to use SOAP encoding (Tuesday, 19 February)
Re: Proposal for issue 78: RPC structs and Encoding root attribute (Tuesday, 19 February)
Re: Proposal for issue 78: RPC structs and Encoding root attribute (Tuesday, 19 February)
Re: Soap Message Canonicalization (SM-C14N) (Tuesday, 19 February)
Re: SOAP Encoding: Default values (Monday, 18 February)
Re: TBTF: Proposed resolution issue 179 (Wednesday, 13 February)
ETF: Telcon Minutes Tues 12th Feb 2002 (Tuesday, 12 February)
New Issue: Fault Code Restrictions (Tuesday, 12 February)
Re: Updated Proposal for Rewrite of Part 1 Section 2 (Tuesday, 12 February)
Re: Proposal for resolution of issue 176 (Tuesday, 12 February)
Re: TBTF: Proposed resolution issue 179 (Tuesday, 12 February)
Re: Updated Proposal for Rewrite of Part 1 Section 2 (Monday, 11 February)
TBTF: Proposed resolution issue 179 (Monday, 11 February)
Re: Possibly defaulted (was RE: Minutes for Thurs 7th Feb 2002 Telcon) (Monday, 11 February)
Updated Proposal for Rewrite of Part 1 Section 2 (Monday, 11 February)
ETF: Minutes for Thurs 7th Feb 2002 Telcon (Friday, 8 February)
Re: TBTF: SOAP MEP vs TMEP (Monday, 4 February)
Re: Who Faulted (was RE: Proposed rewrite of Part 1, section 2 (l ong) ) (Monday, 4 February)

mario.jeckle@daimlerchrysler.com

Antwort: Issue 177: missing elements same as nils? (Wednesday, 6 February)

Mark Baker

Re: Issue 133: SOAP and Web Architecture: Draft sentences for HTTP bi nding preamble. (Monday, 25 February)
Re: SOAP & REST (Thursday, 7 February)
Re: SOAP & REST (Thursday, 7 February)
Re: SOAP & REST (Thursday, 7 February)
Re: Issue 133, and permitting no body (Thursday, 7 February)
Re: SOAP & REST (Wednesday, 6 February)
Re: Issue 133, and permitting no body (Wednesday, 6 February)
Re: Reflective systems (Wednesday, 6 February)
SOAP & REST (Wednesday, 6 February)
Re: TBTF: security considerations proposed text (Tuesday, 5 February)
Re: Issue 133, and permitting no body (Tuesday, 5 February)
Reflective systems (Monday, 4 February)
Re: Issue 133, and permitting no body (Monday, 4 February)
Re: Issue 133, and permitting no body (Monday, 4 February)
Re: Issue 133, and permitting no body (Monday, 4 February)
Re: Issue 133, and permitting no body (Monday, 4 February)
Re: Issue 133, and permitting no body (Sunday, 3 February)
Re: Issue 133, and permitting no body (Saturday, 2 February)
Re: Issue 133, and permitting no body (Saturday, 2 February)
Re: Issue 133, and permitting no body (Saturday, 2 February)
Re: Issue 133, and permitting no body (Friday, 1 February)
Re: Issue 133, and permitting no body (Friday, 1 February)
Re: Issue 133, and permitting no body (Friday, 1 February)
Re: Issue 133, and permitting no body (Friday, 1 February)
Re: Issue 133, and permitting no body (Friday, 1 February)

Mark Nottingham

Re: Issue 133: multple methods per URI (Friday, 22 February)
Issue 133: multple methods per URI (Thursday, 21 February)
Re: Issue 133: SOAP and Web Architecture: Draft sentences for HTTP bi nding preamble. (Thursday, 21 February)
Re: Issue 133: SOAP and Web Architecture: Draft sentences for HTT P bi nding preamble. (Wednesday, 20 February)
Re: Issue 133: SOAP and Web Architecture: Draft sentences for HTT P bi nding preamble. (Wednesday, 20 February)
Re: Soap Message Canonicalization (SM-C14N) (Wednesday, 20 February)
Re: Issue 133: SOAP and Web Architecture: Draft sentences for HTT P bi nding preamble. (Wednesday, 20 February)
Re: Issue 133: SOAP and Web Architecture: Draft sentences for HTTP bi nding preamble. (Tuesday, 19 February)
Re: Issue 133: SOAP and Web Architecture: Draft sentences for HTTP bi nding preamble. (Tuesday, 19 February)
Re: Soap Message Canonicalization (SM-C14N) (Sunday, 17 February)
Re: Soap Message Canonicalization (SM-C14N) (Saturday, 16 February)
Re: Soap Message Canonicalization (SM-C14N) (Saturday, 16 February)
Re: FYI: BCP 56, RFC 3205 on HTTP Layering (Thursday, 14 February)
Re: SOAP & REST (Thursday, 7 February)
Re: Issue 133, and permitting no body (Wednesday, 6 February)
Re: Issue 133, and permitting no body (Tuesday, 5 February)
Re: Issue 133, and permitting no body (Tuesday, 5 February)
Re: Issue 133, and permitting no body (Monday, 4 February)
Re: Issue 133, and permitting no body (Monday, 4 February)
Re: Issue 133, and permitting no body (Saturday, 2 February)
Re: Issue 133, and permitting no body (Friday, 1 February)
Re: Issue 133, and permitting no body (Friday, 1 February)
Re: Rules for intermediaries handling of PIs, whitespace, etc. (Friday, 1 February)

Martin Gudgin

Re: Draft resolution text for Issue 181 ( Revised ) (Tuesday, 26 February)
Re: XML Schema list simple type (Sunday, 24 February)
Draft resolution text for Issue 181 (Saturday, 23 February)
Re: Issue 133: SOAP and Web Architecture: Draft sentences for HTTP bi nding preamble. (Tuesday, 19 February)
Re: Proposal for issue 78: RPC structs and Encoding root attribute (Tuesday, 19 February)
Re: Issue 133: SOAP and Web Architecture: Draft sentences for HTTP bi nding preamble. (Tuesday, 19 February)
SOAP Encoding: Default values (Friday, 15 February)
SOAP Encoding and Schema (Thursday, 14 February)
Re: RPC/Encoding dependency (Tuesday, 12 February)
Re: RPC Mapping (Saturday, 9 February)
Re: RPC Mapping (Friday, 8 February)
Re: RPC Mapping (Friday, 8 February)
RPC/Encoding dependency (Friday, 8 February)
RPC Mapping (Friday, 8 February)
ETF: NOTATION in soap-encoding schema (Friday, 8 February)
Re: NOTATION attribute invalid in soap-encoding (Tuesday, 5 February)
Re: NOTATION attribute invalid in soap-encoding (Tuesday, 5 February)

Marwan Sabbouh

Re: Reflective systems (Tuesday, 5 February)
Re: Reflective systems (Tuesday, 5 February)

Matt Long

RE: Issue with encodingStyle (Wednesday, 6 February)

Max Johnson

RE: NOTATION attribute invalid in soap-encoding (Tuesday, 5 February)

Mike Dierken

RE: SOAP & REST (Monday, 11 February)
RE: Issue 133, and permitting no body (Monday, 11 February)

Mountain, Highland M

Draft Resolution for issue 57 (Monday, 25 February)
Proposed Resolution for Issues 50 and 57 (Saturday, 16 February)
RE: Email binding (Monday, 11 February)

Noah Mendelsohn

RE: XMLP/XMLE Use cases and processing models (Saturday, 16 February)
Re: Soap Message Canonicalization (SM-C14N) (Friday, 15 February)
RE: Issue with soap-rpc:result (Friday, 15 February)
Re: SOAP & REST (Thursday, 7 February)
RE: Issue with soap-rpc:result (Thursday, 7 February)
Re: Issue 133, and permitting no body (Saturday, 2 February)

noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com

xsi:type for multiref targets. (Thursday, 28 February)
Re: using xsi:type with the SOAP encoding rules (Friday, 1 March)
Re: Issue 154: Role invariance - proposed resolution (Wednesday, 27 February)
Re: Draft resolution for issue 59 (Sunday, 24 February)
RE: Issue 182: Fault Code restriction: "At Most One Fault Proposa l" (Saturday, 23 February)
RE: Soap Message Canonicalization (SM-C14N) (Friday, 22 February)
RE: Issue 182: Fault Code restriction: "At Most One Fault Proposal" (Thursday, 21 February)
Re: Issue 133: SOAP and Web Architecture: Draft sentences for HTTP bi nding preamble. (Thursday, 21 February)
RE: Soap Message Canonicalization (SM-C14N) (Thursday, 21 February)
RE: Soap Message Canonicalization (SM-C14N) (Wednesday, 20 February)
RE: Soap Message Canonicalization (SM-C14N) (Wednesday, 20 February)
RE: Soap Message Canonicalization (SM-C14N) (Wednesday, 20 February)
Re: ETF and editors: Issue 17 and 48: Proposal for describing when to use SOAP encoding (Wednesday, 20 February)
RE: XMLP/XMLE Use cases and processing models (Wednesday, 20 February)
Re: Soap Message Canonicalization (SM-C14N) (Tuesday, 19 February)
RE: XMLP/XMLE Use cases and processing models (Tuesday, 19 February)
Re: Soap Message Canonicalization (SM-C14N) (Tuesday, 19 February)
Re: SOAP Encoding: Default values (Tuesday, 19 February)
RE: XMLP/XMLE Use cases and processing models (Tuesday, 19 February)
RE: Issue with soap-rpc:result (Thursday, 14 February)
RE: Issue with soap-rpc:result (Thursday, 14 February)
Re: Resolving the ednote in part 1 section 5.1 (Thursday, 14 February)
Re: TBTF: Proposed resolution issue 179 (Wednesday, 13 February)
Re: TBTF: Proposed resolution issue 179 (Tuesday, 12 February)
RE: Issue with soap-rpc:result (Tuesday, 12 February)
Re: Proposal for resolution of issue 176 (Monday, 11 February)
Re: Proposal for resolution of issue 176 (Monday, 11 February)
Re: TBTF: Proposed resolution issue 179 (Monday, 11 February)
Re: Proposal for resolution of issue 176 (Monday, 11 February)
Re: New issue: Default values of SOAP header block attributes (Monday, 11 February)
Re: TBTF: revised proposed resolution for i178 (Monday, 11 February)
Re: RPC Mapping (Saturday, 9 February)
Re: Issue with encodingStyle (Saturday, 9 February)
Re: XMLP/XMLE Use cases and processing models (Saturday, 9 February)
RE: Issue with soap-rpc:result (Friday, 8 February)
Re: SOAP & REST (Thursday, 7 February)
RE: Issue with soap-rpc:result (Thursday, 7 February)
RE: Issue 133, and permitting no body (Thursday, 7 February)
RE: Issue with encodingStyle (Thursday, 7 February)
RE: Issue with encodingStyle (Wednesday, 6 February)
Re: Issue with soap-rpc:result (Wednesday, 6 February)
RE: Proposed rewrite of Part 1, section 2 (long) (Wednesday, 6 February)
Re: Issue 133: SOAP and The Web Architecture (Wednesday, 6 February)
Re: Issue 133, and permitting no body (Wednesday, 6 February)
Re: Reflective systems (Tuesday, 5 February)
Re: Issue 133, and permitting no body (Tuesday, 5 February)
RE: TBTF: SOAP MEP vs TMEP (Friday, 1 February)
RE: One-way messaging in SOAP 1.2 (Friday, 1 February)
Re: Issue 133, and permitting no body (Friday, 1 February)
Re: Issue 133, and permitting no body (Friday, 1 February)
Re: Who Faulted (was RE: Proposed rewrite of Part 1, section 2 (l ong) ) (Friday, 1 February)

Paul Cotton

RE: NOTATION attribute invalid in soap-encoding (Tuesday, 5 February)

Paul Prescod

Re: Issue 133: SOAP and Web Architecture: Draft sentences for HTTP bi nding preamble. (Saturday, 23 February)
Re: Issue 133: SOAP and Web Architecture: Draft sentences for HTTP bi nding preamble. (Saturday, 23 February)
Re: Issue 133: SOAP and Web Architecture: Draft sentences for HTTP bi nding preamble. (Thursday, 21 February)
Re: Issue 133: SOAP and Web Architecture: Draft sentences for HTT P binding preamble. (Thursday, 21 February)
Re: Issue 133: SOAP and Web Architecture: Draft sentences for HTT P bi nding preamble. (Wednesday, 20 February)
Re: Issue 133: SOAP and Web Architecture: Draft sentences for HTTP bi nding preamble. (Tuesday, 19 February)
Re: Issue 133: SOAP and Web Architecture: Draft sentences for HTTP bi nding preamble. (Tuesday, 19 February)
Re: Issue 133: SOAP and Web Architecture: Draft sentences for HTTP bi nding preamble. (Monday, 18 February)
Proposed issue: Separately named specifications (Tuesday, 12 February)

Rich Salz

Re: xsi:type for multiref targets. (Friday, 1 March)
Re: xsi:type for multiref targets. (Friday, 1 March)
Re: Soap Message Canonicalization (SM-C14N) (Wednesday, 20 February)
Re: Soap Message Canonicalization (SM-C14N) (Wednesday, 20 February)
Re: Soap Message Canonicalization (SM-C14N) (Tuesday, 19 February)
Re: Soap Message Canonicalization (SM-C14N) (Monday, 18 February)
Re: Soap Message Canonicalization (SM-C14N) (Monday, 18 February)
Re: Soap Message Canonicalization (SM-C14N) (Saturday, 16 February)
Re: Soap Message Canonicalization (SM-C14N) (Saturday, 16 February)
Re: Soap Message Canonicalization (SM-C14N) (Friday, 15 February)
Re: Soap Message Canonicalization (SM-C14N) (Friday, 15 February)
Re: Soap Message Canonicalization (SM-C14N) (Friday, 15 February)
Soap Message Canonicalization (SM-C14N) (Friday, 15 February)
Re: Issue with soap-rpc:result (Tuesday, 12 February)
Re: Proposal for resolution of issue 176 (Tuesday, 12 February)
Re: Proposal for resolution of issue 176 (Tuesday, 12 February)
Re: Proposal for resolution of issue 176 (Monday, 11 February)
Re: Issue with soap-rpc:result (Monday, 11 February)
Re: Reflective systems (Saturday, 9 February)
Re: Reflective systems (Wednesday, 6 February)
Re: Issue 133, and permitting no body (Monday, 4 February)

S. Alexander Jacobson

Re: Issue 133: SOAP and Web Architecture: Draft sentences for HTTP bi nding preamble. (Thursday, 21 February)
Re: FYI: BCP 56, RFC 3205 on HTTP Layering (Thursday, 14 February)
Re: Reflective systems (Tuesday, 5 February)

Scott Cantor

RE: xsi:type for multiref targets. (Friday, 1 March)
RE: xsi:type for multiref targets. (Friday, 1 March)

Simon Fell

Re: Possibly defaulted (was RE: Minutes for Thurs 7th Feb 2002 Telcon) (Wednesday, 13 February)
Re: Possibly defaulted (was RE: Minutes for Thurs 7th Feb 2002 Telcon) (Tuesday, 12 February)
Re: [soapbuilders] Updated interop round 2 client results (Saturday, 9 February)
Re: Issue with soap-rpc:result (Wednesday, 6 February)
Re: Issue with soap-rpc:result (Wednesday, 6 February)
Re: SOAP Encoding - Arrays (Tuesday, 5 February)
Re: SOAP Encoding - Arrays (Tuesday, 5 February)

Takeshi Imamura

Re: XMLP/XMLE Use cases and processing models (Tuesday, 12 February)

Tim Ewald

RE: Issue with soap-rpc:result (Saturday, 23 February)
using xsi:type with the SOAP encoding rules (Saturday, 23 February)
RE: Issue with soap-rpc:result (Wednesday, 20 February)
RE: Issue with soap-rpc:result (Wednesday, 20 February)
RE: Issue with soap-rpc:result (Thursday, 14 February)
RE: Issue with soap-rpc:result (Thursday, 14 February)
RE: Issue with soap-rpc:result (Wednesday, 13 February)
RE: Issue with soap-rpc:result (Wednesday, 13 February)
RE: Issue with soap-rpc:result (Saturday, 9 February)
RE: Issue with soap-rpc:result (Friday, 8 February)
Sorry for the duplicate posts (Thursday, 7 February)
RE: Issue with soap-rpc:result (Thursday, 7 February)
RE: Issue with encodingStyle (Thursday, 7 February)
RE: Issue with soap-rpc:result (Thursday, 7 February)
Issue with soap-rpc:result (Thursday, 7 February)
Issue with soap-rpc:result (Thursday, 7 February)
Issue with encodingStyle (Thursday, 7 February)
RE: Issue with soap-rpc:result (Thursday, 7 February)
RE: Issue with soap-rpc:result (Thursday, 7 February)
RE: Issue with soap-rpc:result (Wednesday, 6 February)
Issue with encodingStyle (Wednesday, 6 February)
Issue with soap-rpc:result (Wednesday, 6 February)

Vinoski, Stephen

CFP: Middleware for Web Services (Friday, 22 February)

Williams, Stuart

RE: Issue 182: Fault Code restriction: "At Most One Fault Proposa l" (Sunday, 24 February)
Issue 67: convey error information (Friday, 22 February)
RE: Issue 182: Fault Code restriction: "At Most One Fault Proposa l" (Friday, 22 February)
RE: Issue 133: multple methods per URI (Friday, 22 February)
RE: Issue 182: Fault Code restriction: "At Most One Fault Proposa l" (Friday, 22 February)
RE: Issue 182: Fault Code restriction: "At Most One Fault Proposa l" (Friday, 22 February)
RE: Issue 182: Fault Code restriction: "At Most One Fault Proposa l" (Friday, 22 February)
RE: Issue 182: Fault Code restriction: "At Most One Fault Proposa l" (Thursday, 21 February)
Issue 182: Fault Code restriction: "At Most One Fault Proposal" (Thursday, 21 February)
RE: Issue 133: SOAP and Web Architecture: Draft sentences for HTT P bi nding preamble. (Wednesday, 20 February)
RE: Issue 133: SOAP and Web Architecture: Draft sentences for HTT P binding preamble. (Wednesday, 20 February)
RE: Issue 133: SOAP and Web Architecture: Draft sentences for HTT P bi nding preamble. (Wednesday, 20 February)
RE: Issue 133: SOAP and Web Architecture: Draft sentences for HTT P bi nding preamble. (Wednesday, 20 February)
Issue 133: SOAP and Web Architecture: Draft sentences for HTTP bi nding preamble. (Monday, 18 February)
RE: SOAP & REST (Thursday, 7 February)
RE: Issue 133, and permitting no body (Thursday, 7 February)
RE: SOAP & REST (Thursday, 7 February)
RE: Issue 133, and permitting no body (Wednesday, 6 February)
RE: Issue 133, and permitting no body (Tuesday, 5 February)
RE: Issue 133, and permitting no body (Monday, 4 February)
RE: Issue 133, and permitting no body (Monday, 4 February)
RE: Issue 133, and permitting no body (Monday, 4 February)
Issue 102: Clarify Rules for Delivering Fault Messages (Saturday, 2 February)
RE: TBTF: SOAP MEP vs TMEP (Saturday, 2 February)
RE: Who Faulted (was RE: Proposed rewrite of Part 1, section 2 (l ong) ) (Friday, 1 February)
RE: One-way messaging in SOAP 1.2 (Friday, 1 February)
RE: Who Faulted (was RE: Proposed rewrite of Part 1, section 2 (l ong) ) (Friday, 1 February)

Yves Lafon

minutes of 13 feb 2002 (Wednesday, 20 February)
minutes (Wednesday, 13 February)
Re: SOAP & REST (Thursday, 7 February)
Email binding (Thursday, 7 February)
Re: Issue 133, and permitting no body (Wednesday, 6 February)
Re: SOAP & REST (Wednesday, 6 February)
minutes of 23/01/2002 teleconference (Tuesday, 5 February)
Re: Issue 133, and permitting no body (Friday, 1 February)
Re: Issue 133, and permitting no body (Friday, 1 February)
Re: Issue 133, and permitting no body (Friday, 1 February)

Last message date: Thursday, 28 February 2002 21:58:15 UTC