Sounds perfect to me - thank you! Henrik >I agree. We do need to say something about where blocks can >be inserted. >I would suggest a default behavior that blocks can be inserted >anywhere in >the header, with the usual proviso that mU headers targeted to >the node >can change the rules. Does that sound right? ... >We should by no means preclude even stricter constraints but >it might be better to leave that to our normal extensibility >mechanism. For example, if one wants to control the complete >order of ALL blocks through ALL SOAP nodes in a message path, >would this not be better accomplished by providing a next hop >block that indicates this additional constraint on every node?Received on Saturday, 23 February 2002 17:22:13 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:59:06 GMT