W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-dist-app@w3.org > February 2002

RE: Soap Message Canonicalization (SM-C14N)

From: Henrik Frystyk Nielsen <henrikn@microsoft.com>
Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2002 14:20:40 -0800
Message-ID: <79107D208BA38C45A4E45F62673A434D05A540E1@red-msg-07.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
To: <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com>
Cc: "Marc Hadley" <marc.hadley@Sun.COM>, <rsalz@zolera.com>, "xml-dist-app" <xml-dist-app@w3.org>

Sounds perfect to me - thank you!


>I agree.  We do need to say something about where blocks can
>be inserted. 
>I would suggest a default behavior that blocks can be inserted 
>anywhere in 
>the header, with the usual proviso that mU headers targeted to 
>the node 
>can change the rules.  Does that sound right?


>We should by no means preclude even stricter constraints but
>it might be better to leave that to our normal extensibility 
>mechanism. For example, if one wants to control the complete 
>order of ALL blocks through ALL SOAP nodes in a message path, 
>would this not be better accomplished by providing a next hop 
>block that indicates this additional constraint on every node? 
Received on Saturday, 23 February 2002 17:22:13 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 22:01:18 UTC