- From: Jean-Jacques Moreau <moreau@crf.canon.fr>
- Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2002 15:00:47 +0100
- To: "Williams Stuart" <skw@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- CC: "'xml-dist-app@w3.org'" <xml-dist-app@w3.org>
+1 "Williams, Stuart" wrote: > My conclusion is that the revised proposal, "If processing is unsuccessful, > at-most one fault MAY be generated by the node." is appropriate on two > grounds: > > a) Some failure conditions permit or advise, but do not mandate > the generation of a fault. > > b) It is not clear the the failure to generate an optional > (and even a mandatory) fault lead to interoperability > problems that would necessitate a MUST.
Received on Thursday, 21 February 2002 09:02:14 UTC