W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-dist-app@w3.org > February 2002

Re: Issue 182: Fault Code restriction: "At Most One Fault Proposal"

From: Jean-Jacques Moreau <moreau@crf.canon.fr>
Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2002 15:00:47 +0100
Message-ID: <3C74FD8F.4CAA76B2@crf.canon.fr>
To: "Williams Stuart" <skw@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
CC: "'xml-dist-app@w3.org'" <xml-dist-app@w3.org>
+1

"Williams, Stuart" wrote:

> My conclusion is that the revised proposal, "If processing is unsuccessful,
> at-most one fault MAY be generated by the node." is appropriate on two
> grounds:
>
> a) Some failure conditions permit or advise, but do not mandate
>    the generation of a fault.
>
> b) It is not clear the the failure to generate an optional
>    (and even a mandatory) fault lead to interoperability
>    problems that would necessitate a MUST.
Received on Thursday, 21 February 2002 09:02:14 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:59:06 GMT