W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-dist-app@w3.org > February 2002

RE: Proposal for resolution of issue 176

From: Henrik Frystyk Nielsen <henrikn@microsoft.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2002 14:51:09 -0800
Message-ID: <79107D208BA38C45A4E45F62673A434D0656A93A@red-msg-07.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
To: <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com>, <chris.ferris@sun.com>
Cc: <xml-dist-app@w3.org>

>FWIW, my assumption was that what we used to call header and 
>body blocks 
>would be treated consistently:  anything between those start 
>and end tags, 
>including whitespace, is significant.  Comments and whitespace 
>header blocks insignificant.  I'm a little unsure on the body, 
>given our 
>new rules for interpretation:  maybe evertying between <body> 
>and </body> 
>should be significant.  Was that your point?  If so, I agree. 

This is at least the intent of the proposed wording.

Received on Monday, 11 February 2002 17:51:45 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 22:01:18 UTC