RE: New Issue: Fault Code Restrictions from Henrik Frystyk Nielsen on 2002-02-16 (xml-dist-app@w3.org from February 2002)

From: Henrik Frystyk Nielsen <henrikn@microsoft.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2002 18:57:43 -0800
To: "Marc Hadley" <marc.hadley@sun.com>, "XML Protocol Discussion" <xml-dist-app@w3.org>
Message-ID: <79107D208BA38C45A4E45F62673A434D067C7E4C@red-msg-07.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>

I agree with this. A purely editorial nit, we should of course refer to
the soap fault section.

Henrik 

>I suggest that we open a new issue on this and would like to 
>propose the 
>following rewrite as a resolution:
>
>"If processing is unsuccessful, exactly one fault MUST be generated by 
>the node. Header-related faults other than mustUnderstand faults MUST 
>conform to the specification for the corresponding SOAP header block."

Received on Friday, 15 February 2002 21:58:45 UTC