W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-dist-app@w3.org > February 2002

Re: Issue 133: SOAP and The Web Architecture

From: <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2002 09:44:31 -0500
To: dhugo@us.ibm.com
Cc: xml-dist-app@w3.org
Message-ID: <OF387A64E2.CB0F6F5D-ON85256B58.0051E816@lotus.com>
+1.  Sounds good to me.

Noah Mendelsohn                              Voice: 1-617-693-4036
IBM Corporation                                Fax: 1-617-693-8676
One Rogers Street
Cambridge, MA 02142

Hugo Haas <hugo@w3.org>
Sent by: xml-dist-app-request@w3.org
02/01/2002 05:48 PM

        To:     xml-dist-app@w3.org
        Subject:        Re: Issue 133: SOAP and The Web Architecture

* Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org> [2002-01-31 16:24-0500]
> Stuart, TBTF,
> > So, at this time the proposal from the TBTF to close Issue 133 is that 
> > binding we offer in SOAP 1.2 continue to use the HTTP POST method in 
> > manner established in SOAP 1.1 and to note that our binding framework 
> > it is possible to define additional HTTP bindings.
> I don't believe that addresses the issue.
> IMO, a simple way to address this issue would be to say that the HTTP
> binding that we have defined can be used in a manner that preserves POST
> semantics, but that it's up to the developer to use it that way - the
> same way it's up to them to use it without SOAP in the picture.

I agree that some guidelines about the use of the binding should be
included, and also possibly something about using SOAP in a context
without side-effects.



Hugo Haas - W3C
mailto:hugo@w3.org - http://www.w3.org/People/Hugo/ - tel:+1-617-452-2092
Received on Wednesday, 6 February 2002 09:58:44 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 22:01:18 UTC