- From: Rich Salz <rsalz@zolera.com>
- Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2002 19:21:38 -0500
- To: noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
- CC: xml-dist-app <xml-dist-app@w3.org>
I'm confused. There's a proposal to specify what intermediaries can do to a message. Since this would break something from SOAP 1.1 (the ability to sign messages), it makes sense to me that *at the same time* we define a way to sign messages, or parts thereof. Why wait? It's already proven useful -- e.g., showing that we want to make sure that intermediaries don't re-order headers. :) I totally agree that signing some -- not all -- header elements is important, which is why it's covered in the text. /r$ -- Zolera Systems, Securing web services (XML, SOAP, Signatures, Encryption) http://www.zolera.com
Received on Tuesday, 19 February 2002 19:19:57 UTC