W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-dist-app@w3.org > February 2002

Re: RPC Mapping

From: Martin Gudgin <marting@develop.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2002 17:58:49 -0000
Message-ID: <016f01c1b0ca$4455ca80$b47ba8c0@zerogravitas>
To: "Henrik Frystyk Nielsen" <henrikn@microsoft.com>, "XML Protocol Discussion" <xml-dist-app@w3.org>
OK, I think we should raise this as an issue. This has come up because I'm
rewriting the RPC section in terms of Infoset. As an editor, I need the WG
to tell me which way to go.

Gudge

----- Original Message -----
From: "Henrik Frystyk Nielsen" <henrikn@microsoft.com>
To: "Martin Gudgin" <marting@develop.com>; "XML Protocol Discussion"
<xml-dist-app@w3.org>
Sent: Friday, February 08, 2002 5:56 PM
Subject: RE: RPC Mapping



>OK, but what about the fact that the [in] params 'will be' in
>the order of the method sig but the [out] params 'SHOULD' be
>in the order of the method sig?

My feeling is that we don't have to say anything about ordering. In case
we do want to say something, I think it should be in the form of a
non-normative implementation note.

Henrik
Received on Friday, 8 February 2002 12:59:49 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:59:06 GMT