W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-dist-app@w3.org > February 2002

RE: Issue 133: SOAP and Web Architecture: Draft sentences for HTT P bi nding preamble.

From: Williams, Stuart <skw@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2002 21:28:23 -0000
Message-ID: <5E13A1874524D411A876006008CD059F19299A@0-mail-1.hpl.hp.com>
To: "'Mark Nottingham'" <mnot@mnot.net>, Paul Prescod <paul@prescod.net>
Cc: xml-dist-app@w3.org, Martin Gudgin <marting@develop.com>
> From: Mark Nottingham [mailto:mnot@mnot.net]
> Sent: 20 February 2002 18:42
> To: Paul Prescod
> Cc: Williams, Stuart; xml-dist-app@w3.org; Martin Gudgin; Paul Prescod
> Subject: Re: Issue 133: SOAP and Web Architecture: Draft sentences for
> HTT P bi nding preamble.
> 
> 
> 
> On Wed, Feb 20, 2002 at 10:16:59AM -0800, Paul Prescod wrote:
> > If you (and they) would separate out your data model from your
> > syntax then this would be even easier. XML is *just a data format*.
> > If it gets in the way, get rid of it!
> 
> Exactly! If the WG defines a mechanism whereby different data models
> from the envelope can be serialised into the URI, GET becomes easy,
> as long as the other limitations of GET are acknowledged. The obvious
> serialisation to start with is of section 5 encoding.

And for an arbitrary SOAP message?

> -- 
> Mark Nottingham
> http://www.mnot.net/

Cheers,

Stuart
Received on Wednesday, 20 February 2002 16:29:04 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:59:06 GMT