W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-dist-app@w3.org > February 2002

RE: NOTATION attribute invalid in soap-encoding

From: Paul Cotton <pcotton@microsoft.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2002 19:46:36 -0500
Message-ID: <E7AC4500EAB7A442ABA7521D18814397028D130E@tor-msg-01.northamerica.corp.microsoft.com>
To: <xml-dist-app@w3.org>
Cc: "Max Johnson" <max.johnson@dealspark.com>, <www-ws@w3.org>
> I would very much appreciate if anyone can tell me how anomalies such
as
this one are resolved and the likely timeframe for a fix to be applied?

I am forwarding your question to the technical email list for the W3C
XML Protocol WG who is responsible for the Schema you are writing about.
I am sure we should get a WG response to you in less than a week and
hopefully in a few days.

/paulc

Paul Cotton, Microsoft Canada 
17 Eleanor Drive, Nepean, Ontario K2E 6A3 
Tel: (613) 225-5445 Fax: (425) 936-7329 
<mailto:pcotton@microsoft.com> 


-----Original Message-----
From: Max Johnson [mailto:max.johnson@dealspark.com] 
Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 11:31 AM
To: www-ws@w3.org
Subject: NOTATION attribute invalid in soap-encoding

The SOAP serialization rules defined in
http://www.w3.org/2001/12/soap-encoding appear to have a bogus
attribute:

	<xs:attribute name="NOTATION" type="tns:NOTATION"/>
	<xs:complexType name="NOTATION">
		<xs:simpleContent>
			<xs:extension base="xs:NOTATION">
				<xs:attributeGroup
ref="tns:commonAttributes"/>
			</xs:extension>
		</xs:simpleContent>
	</xs:complexType>

As the W3C's XML Schema Recommendation specifies that attributes must be
simple types the above would seem to be invalid. I assume the intention
was
that NOTATION be an element?

I would very much appreciate if anyone can tell me how anomalies such as
this one are resolved and the likely timeframe for a fix to be applied?

Regards

Max Johnson
DealSpark
Received on Monday, 4 February 2002 19:47:23 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:59:06 GMT