W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-dist-app@w3.org > February 2002

RE: Issue with soap-rpc:result

From: Tim Ewald <tjewald@develop.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2002 10:48:52 -0500
To: "XMLDISTAPP" <xml-dist-app@w3.org>
Message-ID: <003e01c1afee$f972c490$b185413f@northpole>
So why are SOAP faults modeled in XSD and not the SOAP data model? Can't
a Fault's detail element contain a serialized graph? Why the
inconsistency?

Tim-

> -----Original Message-----
> From: xml-dist-app-request@w3.org 
> [mailto:xml-dist-app-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Jacek Kopecky
> Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2002 5:22 AM
> To: Don Box
> Cc: soap@zaks.demon.co.uk; xml-dist-app@w3.org
> Subject: RE: Issue with soap-rpc:result
> 
> 
>  Don,
>  AFAIK SOAP faults are not modeled using the SOAP Encoding, 
> they are described using XML Schema (as the rest of the 
> envelope), so I think you want to advocate the status quo. 
> 8-)  Best regards,
>  
>                    Jacek Kopecky
> 
>                    Senior Architect, Systinet (formerly Idoox)
>                    http://www.systinet.com/
> 
> 
> 
> On Wed, 6 Feb 2002, Don Box wrote:
> 
>  > Since SOAP/1.2 explicitly relies on XML Schema, I would 
> advocate making  > faults based solely on XML Schema (e.g., 
> literal). This is especially  > important since the fault 
> itself may be indicating that an unknown  > encoding was used!
> 
> 
Received on Thursday, 7 February 2002 10:50:30 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:59:06 GMT