- From: Marc Hadley <marc.hadley@sun.com>
- Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2002 10:59:18 +0000
- To: Martin Gudgin <marting@develop.com>
- CC: XML Protocol Discussion <xml-dist-app@w3.org>
I think its trying to say: An omitted accessor is equivalent to an included accessor with an xsi:nil attribute. The interpretation is application dependent. Typical interpretation would be to substitue NULL or some application dependent default value. Marc. Martin Gudgin wrote: > Section 3.6[1] of Part 2[2] states; > > 'An omitted accessor element implies either a default value or that no value > is known. The specifics depend on the accessor, method, and its context. For > example, an omitted accessor typically implies a Null value for polymorphic > accessors (with the exact meaning of Null accessor-dependent). Likewise, an > omitted Boolean accessor typically implies either a False value or that no > value is known, and an omitted numeric accessor typically implies either > that the value is zero or that no value is known.' > I'm not convinced that this text is at all useful. It seems to say > > 'If the accessor isn't there, then any number of things might be true...' > and doesn't say much about what those things might be. > > What is the paragraph *supposed* to be saying? > > Gudge > > [1] http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/1/11/10/soap12-part2.xml#IDA5FQLB > > [2] http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/1/11/10/soap12-part2.xml > > > -- Marc Hadley <marc.hadley@sun.com> XML Technology Centre, Sun Microsystems.
Received on Monday, 18 February 2002 05:59:31 UTC