Tuesday, 1 May 2001
Monday, 30 April 2001
Friday, 27 April 2001
Sunday, 29 April 2001
- RE: "If" and "else" in RDF
- Re: "If" and "else" in RDF
- RE: "If" and "else" in RDF
- Re: "If" and "else" in RDF
- Re: "If" and "else" in RDF
- RE: "If" and "else" in RDF
- RE: "If" and "else" in RDF
- Re: "If" and "else" in RDF
- RE: "If" and "else" in RDF
- RE: "If" and "else" in RDF
- Re: "If" and "else" in RDF
- RE: "If" and "else" in RDF
Saturday, 28 April 2001
Sunday, 29 April 2001
Saturday, 28 April 2001
- Re: "If" and "else" in RDF
- Re: "If" and "else" in RDF
- RE: "If" and "else" in RDF
- Re: "If" and "else" in RDF
- RE: "If" and "else" in RDF
- Re: "If" and "else" in RDF
- RE: "If" and "else" in RDF
- RE: "If" and "else" in RDF
- RE: "If" and "else" in RDF
- Re: "If" and "else" in RDF
- Re: "If" and "else" in RDF
- Re: "If" and "else" in RDF
- Re: "If" and "else" in RDF
- Re: RDF Datatypes
- "If" and "else" in RDF
- RDF Datatypes
Friday, 27 April 2001
- Re: CG: Re: 'Meta' terminology
- RE: 'Meta' terminology (was RE: N3 contexts vs RDF reification)
- Re: 'Meta' terminology (was RE: N3 contexts vs RDF reification)
- Re: 'Meta' terminology (was RE: N3 contexts vs RDF reification)
- Re: N3 contexts vs RDF reification
- Re: 'Meta' terminology (was RE: N3 contexts vs RDF reification)
- Re: N3 contexts vs RDF reification
- Re: 'Meta' terminology (was RE: N3 contexts vs RDF reification)
- Re: RDF and xml:base
- RDF and xml:base
- Re: application/rdf+xml
- Re: N3 contexts vs RDF reification
- RE: N3 contexts vs RDF reification
- 'Meta' terminology (was RE: N3 contexts vs RDF reification)
- RE: N3 contexts vs RDF reification
- Re: Wanting focus on the bigger picture...
- RE: N3 contexts vs RDF reification
- Re: N3 contexts vs RDF reification
Thursday, 26 April 2001
- RE: N3 contexts vs RDF reification
- RE: N3 contexts vs RDF reification
- Re: A Simple Analogy
- Re: N3 contexts vs RDF reification
- Re: Wanting focus on the bigger picture...
- Wanting focus on the bigger picture...
- RE: N3 contexts vs RDF reification
- RE: N3 contexts vs RDF reification
- WWW10 social get-together
- RE: N3 contexts vs RDF reification
- Re: N3 contexts vs RDF reification
- EARL 0.9 Release
Wednesday, 25 April 2001
- RE: N3 contexts vs RDF reification
- Re: N3 contexts vs RDF reification
- Re: N3 contexts vs RDF reification
- RE: N3 contexts vs RDF reification
- RE: N3 contexts vs RDF reification
- Redfoot 0.9.6 released
- Re: Is this valid use?
- Re: ContentType negotiation
- Re: RDF Media Type
- XMTP: new version and SAX implementation
Tuesday, 24 April 2001
- Re: Is this valid use?
- RE: Is this valid use?
- Is this valid use?
- Re: N3 contexts vs RDF reification
- RE: RDF Media Type (rdaniel@interwoven.com)
- Sets of resources, was: Re: ContentType negotiation
- RE: ContentType negotiation
Thursday, 19 April 2001
Wednesday, 4 April 2001
Tuesday, 24 April 2001
- N3 contexts vs RDF reification
- RE: ContentType negotiation
- RE: ContentType negotiation
- RE: ContentType negotiation
- RE: ContentType negotiation
- RE: ContentType negotiation
- Re: ContentType negotiation
- RDF Schema "Validator" in Notation3
Monday, 23 April 2001
- Re: ContentType negotiation
- RE: ContentType negotiation
- RE: RDF Media Type
- RE: RDF Media Type
- Re: RDF Media Type
- RE: RDF Media Type
- RE: Linking RDF
- RE: ContentType negotiation
- RE: ContentType negotiation
- Re: ContentType negotiation
Sunday, 22 April 2001
- Re: Returned message - mailbox size exceeded
- FW: Returned message - mailbox size exceeded
- DAML & XML Schema
- RDF Media Type
- Mr. Topping
- RE: Common Metadata (was:RE: RDF in XHTML)
- RE: Common Metadata (was:RE: RDF in XHTML)
- RE: Common Metadata (was:RE: RDF in XHTML)
- RE: Common Metadata (was:RE: RDF in XHTML)
Saturday, 21 April 2001
- RE: Common Metadata (was:RE: RDF in XHTML)
- RE: Common Metadata (was:RE: RDF in XHTML)
- RE: good elevator pitch for Semantic Web
- Re: Common Metadata (was:RE: RDF in XHTML)
- RE: Common Metadata (was:RE: RDF in XHTML)
Friday, 20 April 2001
- RE: good elevator pitch for Semantic Web
- Re: Common Metadata (was:RE: RDF in XHTML)
- Re: Common Metadata (was:RE: RDF in XHTML)
- RE: RDF in XHTML
- RE: Common Metadata (was:RE: RDF in XHTML)
- Re: Linking RDF
- Re: Linking RDF
- Re: Common Metadata (was:RE: RDF in XHTML)
- Re: RDF in XHTML
- RE: Linking RDF
- RDF serialization type vs. schemata (was Re: RDF in XHTML)
- Re: RDF in XHTML
- RE: Linking RDF
- Common Metadata (was:RE: RDF in XHTML)
- RE: RDF in XHTML
- RE: good elevator pitch for Semantic Web
- RE: good elevator pitch for Semantic Web
- Call for Chapter Proposals
- Re: Subject: good elevator pitch for Semantic Web
- Subject: good elevator pitch for Semantic Web
- Subject: good elevator pitch for Semantic Web
Thursday, 19 April 2001
- Re: RDF in XHTML
- Re: RDF in XHTML
- Re: RDF in XHTML
- Re: RDF in XHTML
- good elevator pitch for Semantic Web
- Re: RDF in XHTML
- Re: Linking RDF
- RE: RDF in XHTML
- Survey: RDF data stores
- RE: Linking RDF
- ContentType negotiation
- RE: Semantic API
- Re: RDF in XHTML
- Re: Linking RDF
- RE: RDF in XHTML
- RE: RDF in XHTML
- Re: Linking RDF
- Re: Linking RDF
- Re: Linking RDF
- Re: Linking RDF
- Re: Linking RDF
- Re: Linking RDF
- RE: Linking RDF
Wednesday, 18 April 2001
- Re: Linking RDF
- RE: Linking RDF
- Re: Linking RDF
- RDF PNG Icon
- Re: Linking RDF
- Re: Linking RDF
- Re: Linking RDF
- RE: RDF from RDBMS
- RE: RDF from RDBMS
- RE: RDF in XHTML
- RDF from RDBMS
- RE: RDF in XHTML
- RE: Metadata spoofing
- Re: URIs / URLs
- Re: RDF in XHTML
- Re: RDF in XHTML
- Re: RDF in XHTML
- Re: RDF in XHTML
- Re: URIs / URLs
- Open Ph.D. Position - Knowledge Portals
- RE: RDF in XHTML
- RE: RDF in XHTML
- Re: RDF in XHTML
Tuesday, 17 April 2001
Wednesday, 18 April 2001
Tuesday, 17 April 2001
- Re: RDF in XHTML
- RE: Metadata spoofing
- Re: RDF in XHTML
- Re: RDF in XHTML
- Re: RDF in XHTML
- Re: RDF in XHTML
- Re: RDF in XHTML
- RE: Metadata spoofing
- Re: RDF in XHTML
- Re: RDF in XHTML
- RE: RDF in XHTML
- Linking RDF
- Re: RDF in XHTML
- RE: Semantic API
- Re: Semantic API
- RE: RDF in XHTML
- Semantic API
- RE: RDF in XHTML
- Semantic API
- Re: RDF in XHTML
- Re: Can Resource be the top of our ontology ?
- RE: RDF in XHTML
- RE: RDF in XHTML
Monday, 16 April 2001
Tuesday, 17 April 2001
Monday, 16 April 2001
- Re: RDF in XHTML
- Re: RDF in XHTML
- Re: RDF in XHTML
- RE: RDF in XHTML
- Re: RDF in XHTML
- Re: RDF in XHTML
- Re: RDF in XHTML
- Re: RDF in XHTML
- Re: RDF in XHTML
- Re: language and adoption
- Re: RDF in XHTML
- RE: language and adoption
- Re: RDF in XHTML
- Re: RDF in XHTML [was: Re: Authors describing what their URIs mean]
- Re: language and adoption
- RE: RDF in XHTML
- Re: RDF in XHTML
- RE: RDF in XHTML [was: Re: Authors describing what their URIs mean]
- language and adoption
- RE: RDF in XHTML
- Re: RDF in XHTML
- Re: RDF in XHTML [was: Re: Authors describing what their URIs mean]
- RE: Metadata spoofing
- Re: RDF in HTML (Was RDF in XHTML)
- Re: Quoting triples: An RDF fragment identifier syntax
- Re: Representing the Differences Between two Models
- Re: Attributes and Namespaces.
- Re: URIs / URLs
- Metadata spoofing
- Re: URIs / URLs
- Re: Reification of Sets (of RDF Statement, for Queries)
- RE: Zen & Chinwag
- Re: RDF in XHTML [was: Re: Authors describing what their URIs mean]
- Re: RDF in XHTML
- RE: A Simple Analogy
- Re: RDF in XHTML [was: Re: Authors describing what their URIs mean]
- RE: RDF in XHTML [was: Re: Authors describing what their URIs mean]
- Re: RDF in XHTML [was: Re: Authors describing what their URIs mean]
- RE: Zen & Chinwag
- RE: Zen & Chinwag
- RE: A Simple Analogy
- RE: Spec doesn't talk about two-valued relationships
- Re: Zen & Chinwag
- Re: RDF in HTML (Was RDF in XHTML)
Sunday, 15 April 2001
- Re: RDF in XHTML [was: Re: Authors describing what their URIs mean]
- RE: A Simple Analogy
- RE: RDF in HTML (Was RDF in XHTML)
- RE: RDF in HTML
- Re: Terminology for RDF Statement Sets
- Re: Terminology for RDF Statement Sets
- Re: URIs / URLs
- Re: Spec doesn't talk about two-valued relationships
- Re: RDF in XHTML [was: Re: Authors describing what their URIs mean]
- RE: A Simple Analogy
- RDF in XHTML [was: Re: Authors describing what their URIs mean]
- RE: Sign Your Page in RDF (Quick Start Guide)
- RE: Authors describing what their URIs mean
- Re: Authors describing what their URIs mean
- RE: A Simple Analogy
- RE: Authors describing what their URIs mean
- RE: Authors describing what their URIs mean
Saturday, 14 April 2001
- RE: A Simple Analogy
- Crossposting to RDF lists, chat(ter) and IRC
- RE: A Simple Analogy
- Re: Authors describing what their URIs mean
- RE: Authors describing what their URIs mean
- RE: A Simple Analogy
- RE: A Simple Analogy
- Authors describing what their URIs mean
- RE: A Simple Analogy
- Re: Literal value
- A Simple Analogy
- Quoting triples: An RDF fragment identifier syntax
Friday, 13 April 2001
- Re: Reification of Sets (of RDF Statement, for Queries)
- RE: Vance
- Literal value
- RE: Vance
- Re: Vance
- Re: Vance
- RE: Vance
- RE: Vance
- Re: Vance
- RE: Vance
- Re: URIs / URLs
- Re: What Name Should A Namespace Name?
- Re: URIs / URLs
- Vance
- RE: Zen & Chinwag
- Re: URIs / URLs
- Re: Reification of Sets (of RDF Statement, for Queries)
- Re: Terminology for RDF Statement Sets
- Re: Reification of Sets (of RDF Statement, for Queries)
- Re: Terminology for RDF Statement Sets
- Re: URIs / URLs
- RE: URIs / URLs
- Zen & Chinwag
- Re: URIs / URLs
- Re: URIs / URLs
- Re: URIs / URLs
- Sci-Am scenario and RPP
- RE: URIs / URLs
Thursday, 12 April 2001
- Re: URIs / URLs
- Re: URIs / URLs
- RE: URIs / URLs
- RE: URIs / URLs
- RE: URIs / URLs
- RE: URIs / URLs
- RE: URIs / URLs
- Re: URIs / URLs
- Re: URIs / URLs
- Re: URIs / URLs
- Re: Solutions to the Identification Problem, was Re: URIs / URLs
- RE: URIs / URLs
- Re: URIs / URLs
- Re: Solutions to the Identification Problem, was Re: URIs / URLs
- Re: URIs / URLs
- Re: Can Resource be the top of our ontology ?
- Re: What Name Should A Namespace Name?
- Re: URIs / URLs
- Re: URIs / URLs
- First RDF binding proposal::IMS MD-Interoperability (fwd)
- Re: Solutions to the Identification Problem, was Re: URIs / URLs
- Re: URIs / URLs
- RE: URIs / URLs
- RE: URIs / URLs
- RE: URIs / URLs
- RE: URIs / URLs
- Re: URIs / URLs
- RE: URIs / URLs
- RE: URIs / URLs
- RE: URIs / URLs
- Re: URIs / URLs
- RE: URIs / URLs
- RE: URIs / URLs
- RE: URIs / URLs
- RE: URIs / URLs
- RE: URIs / URLs
- RE: URIs / URLs
- RE: URIs / URLs
- Solutions to the Identification Problem, was Re: URIs / URLs
- RE: URIs / URLs
- RE: URIs / URLs
- RE: URIs / URLs
- RE: Can Resource be the top of our ontology ?
- Re: What Name Should A Namespace Name?
- RE: URIs / URLs
- Re: URIs / URLs
- Re: URIs / URLs
- Re: URIs / URLs
- Re: URIs / URLs
- Re: URIs / URLs
- Re: URIs / URLs
- Re: URIs / URLs
- Re: URIs / URLs
- Re: URIs / URLs
Wednesday, 11 April 2001
- Re: URIs / URLs
- Re: Qualified Cardinality
- Re: URIs / URLs
- Re: ANN: Semantic Web in SciAm
- Re: ANN: Semantic Web in SciAm
- ANN: Semantic Web in SciAm
- Re: Can Resource be the top of our ontology ?
- RE: schema repository?
- Qualified Cardinality
- RE: What Name Should A Namespace Name?
- Re: What Name Should A Namespace Name?
- Re: URIs / URLs
- RE: What Name Should A Namespace Name?
- What Name Should A Namespace Name?
- RE: ANN : RDF Process Profile (RPP)
- Re: ANN : RDF Process Profile (RPP)
- Re: ANN : RDF Process Profile (RPP)
- ANN : RDF Process Profile (RPP)
- Re: An interesting problem in InfoSet
- Re: schema repository?
- RE: URIs / URLs
- Re: Reification of Sets (of RDF Statement, for Queries)
- RE: URIs / URLs
- Re: URIs / URLs
Monday, 9 April 2001
Wednesday, 11 April 2001
Tuesday, 10 April 2001
- Re: URIs / URLs
- RE: URIs / URLs
- Re: URIs / URLs
- Re: Reification of Sets (of RDF Statement, for Queries)
- RDFCore Call for Participation is with AC reps
- Re: URIs / URLs
- Re: Reification of Sets (of RDF Statement, for Queries)
- RE: Reification of Sets (of RDF Statement, for Queries)
- RE: Reification of Sets (of RDF Statement, for Queries)
- Re: URIs / URLs
- RE: Reification of Sets (of RDF Statement, for Queries)
- RE: Can Resource be the top of our ontology ?
- Networked Knowledge Organization Systems, special issue of JoDI published
- RE: Reification of Sets (of RDF Statement, for Queries)
- Re: Reification of Sets (of RDF Statement, for Queries)
- RE: Reification of Sets (of RDF Statement, for Queries)
- RE: Can Resource be the top of our ontology ?
- RE: Reification of Sets (of RDF Statement, for Queries)
- RE: Can Resource be the top of our ontology ?
- Re: eor.dublincore.org
Monday, 9 April 2001
- Reification of Sets (of RDF Statement, for Queries)
- Terminology for RDF Statement Sets
- RE: Can Resource be the top of our ontology ?
- RE: Can Resource be the top of our ontology ?
- RE: URIs / URLs
- RE: URIs / URLs
- RE: Can Resource be the top of our ontology ?
- Re: URIs / URLs
Sunday, 8 April 2001
- RE: Can Resource be the top of our ontology ?
- RE: Can Resource be the top of our ontology ?
- Re: Can Resource be the top of our ontology ?
- Re: Can Resource be the top of our ontology ?
- Re: Can Resource be the top of our ontology ?
- RE: Can Resource be the top of our ontology ?
- Re: Can Resource be the top of our ontology ?
- Re: eor.dublincore.org
- RE: Can Resource be the top of our ontology ?
- RE: Can Resource be the top of our ontology ?
- Re: Can Resource be the top of our ontology ?
- Can Resource be the top of our ontology ?
- eor.dublincore.org
- Re: URIs / URLs
- schema repository?
- Re: calendaring work
Saturday, 7 April 2001
Friday, 6 April 2001
- Re: URIs / URLs
- Re: SWAG: Ann: Sign Your Page in RDF (Quick Start Guide)
- Re: URIs / URLs
- Ann: Sign Your Page in RDF (Quick Start Guide)
- Re: URIs / URLs
- Re: URIs / URLs
- Re: URIs / URLs
- RE: URIs / URLs
- RE: URIs / URLs
- CFP[ext. deadline]: International Semantic Web Workshop (Infrastructure and Applications for the Semantic Web)
Thursday, 5 April 2001
- Sesame RDFS Query & Storing service back online
- Re: calendaring work
- An interesting problem in InfoSet
- URIs / URLs
- Re: Dispositions of Dave Beckett's comments
- Re: Dispositions of Dave Beckett's comments
- Re: Comments on http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/WD-CCPP-struct-vocab-20010315/
- RE: calendaring work
- calendaring work
Tuesday, 3 April 2001
- Re: Comments on http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/WD-CCPP-struct-vocab-20010315/
- RE: Dispositions of Dave Beckett's comments
- RE: Dispositions of Dave Beckett's comments
- Re: Dispositions of Dave Beckett's comments
- RE: Dispositions of Dave Beckett's comments
Monday, 2 April 2001
- Re: Dispositions of Dave Beckett's comments
- Re: Dispositions of Dave Beckett's comments
- RE: Dispositions of Dave Beckett's comments
- Re: Dispositions of Dave Beckett's comments
- RE: Dispositions of Dave Beckett's comments
- RE: Dispositions of Dave Beckett's comments
- RE: Dispositions of Dave Beckett's comments
- RE: Dispositions of Dave Beckett's comments
- RE: Dispositions of Dave Beckett's comments
- Re: Dispositions of Dave Beckett's comments