Tuesday, 1 May 2001
Monday, 30 April 2001
Friday, 27 April 2001
Sunday, 29 April 2001
- RE: "If" and "else" in RDF
 - Re: "If" and "else" in RDF
 - RE: "If" and "else" in RDF
 - Re: "If" and "else" in RDF
 - Re: "If" and "else" in RDF
 - RE: "If" and "else" in RDF
 - RE: "If" and "else" in RDF
 - Re: "If" and "else" in RDF
 - RE: "If" and "else" in RDF
 - RE: "If" and "else" in RDF
 - Re: "If" and "else" in RDF
 - RE: "If" and "else" in RDF
 
Saturday, 28 April 2001
Sunday, 29 April 2001
Saturday, 28 April 2001
- Re: "If" and "else" in RDF
 - Re: "If" and "else" in RDF
 - RE: "If" and "else" in RDF
 - Re: "If" and "else" in RDF
 - RE: "If" and "else" in RDF
 - Re: "If" and "else" in RDF
 - RE: "If" and "else" in RDF
 - RE: "If" and "else" in RDF
 - RE: "If" and "else" in RDF
 - Re: "If" and "else" in RDF
 - Re: "If" and "else" in RDF
 - Re: "If" and "else" in RDF
 - Re: "If" and "else" in RDF
 - Re: RDF Datatypes
 - "If" and "else" in RDF
 - RDF Datatypes
 
Friday, 27 April 2001
- Re: CG: Re: 'Meta' terminology
 - RE: 'Meta' terminology (was RE: N3 contexts vs RDF reification)
 - Re: 'Meta' terminology (was RE: N3 contexts vs RDF reification)
 - Re: 'Meta' terminology (was RE: N3 contexts vs RDF reification)
 - Re: N3 contexts vs RDF reification
 - Re: 'Meta' terminology (was RE: N3 contexts vs RDF reification)
 - Re: N3 contexts vs RDF reification
 - Re: 'Meta' terminology (was RE: N3 contexts vs RDF reification)
 - Re: RDF and xml:base
 - RDF and xml:base
 - Re: application/rdf+xml
 - Re: N3 contexts vs RDF reification
 - RE: N3 contexts vs RDF reification
 - 'Meta' terminology (was RE: N3 contexts vs RDF reification)
 - RE: N3 contexts vs RDF reification
 - Re: Wanting focus on the bigger picture...
 - RE: N3 contexts vs RDF reification
 - Re: N3 contexts vs RDF reification
 
Thursday, 26 April 2001
- RE: N3 contexts vs RDF reification
 - RE: N3 contexts vs RDF reification
 - Re: A Simple Analogy
 - Re: N3 contexts vs RDF reification
 - Re: Wanting focus on the bigger picture...
 - Wanting focus on the bigger picture...
 - RE: N3 contexts vs RDF reification
 - RE: N3 contexts vs RDF reification
 - WWW10 social get-together
 - RE: N3 contexts vs RDF reification
 - Re: N3 contexts vs RDF reification
 - EARL 0.9 Release
 
Wednesday, 25 April 2001
- RE: N3 contexts vs RDF reification
 - Re: N3 contexts vs RDF reification
 - Re: N3 contexts vs RDF reification
 - RE: N3 contexts vs RDF reification
 - RE: N3 contexts vs RDF reification
 - Redfoot 0.9.6 released
 - Re: Is this valid use?
 - Re: ContentType negotiation
 - Re: RDF Media Type
 - XMTP: new version and SAX implementation
 
Tuesday, 24 April 2001
- Re: Is this valid use?
 - RE: Is this valid use?
 - Is this valid use?
 - Re: N3 contexts vs RDF reification
 - RE: RDF Media Type (rdaniel@interwoven.com)
 - Sets of resources, was: Re: ContentType negotiation
 - RE: ContentType negotiation
 
Thursday, 19 April 2001
Wednesday, 4 April 2001
Tuesday, 24 April 2001
- N3 contexts vs RDF reification
 - RE: ContentType negotiation
 - RE: ContentType negotiation
 - RE: ContentType negotiation
 - RE: ContentType negotiation
 - RE: ContentType negotiation
 - Re: ContentType negotiation
 - RDF Schema "Validator" in Notation3
 
Monday, 23 April 2001
- Re: ContentType negotiation
 - RE: ContentType negotiation
 - RE: RDF Media Type
 - RE: RDF Media Type
 - Re: RDF Media Type
 - RE: RDF Media Type
 - RE: Linking RDF
 - RE: ContentType negotiation
 - RE: ContentType negotiation
 - Re: ContentType negotiation
 
Sunday, 22 April 2001
- Re: Returned message - mailbox size exceeded
 - FW: Returned message - mailbox size exceeded
 - DAML & XML Schema
 - RDF Media Type
 - Mr. Topping
 - RE: Common Metadata (was:RE: RDF in XHTML)
 - RE: Common Metadata (was:RE: RDF in XHTML)
 - RE: Common Metadata (was:RE: RDF in XHTML)
 - RE: Common Metadata (was:RE: RDF in XHTML)
 
Saturday, 21 April 2001
- RE: Common Metadata (was:RE: RDF in XHTML)
 - RE: Common Metadata (was:RE: RDF in XHTML)
 - RE: good elevator pitch for Semantic Web
 - Re: Common Metadata (was:RE: RDF in XHTML)
 - RE: Common Metadata (was:RE: RDF in XHTML)
 
Friday, 20 April 2001
- RE: good elevator pitch for Semantic Web
 - Re: Common Metadata (was:RE: RDF in XHTML)
 - Re: Common Metadata (was:RE: RDF in XHTML)
 - RE: RDF in XHTML
 - RE: Common Metadata (was:RE: RDF in XHTML)
 - Re: Linking RDF
 - Re: Linking RDF
 - Re: Common Metadata (was:RE: RDF in XHTML)
 - Re: RDF in XHTML
 - RE: Linking RDF
 - RDF serialization type vs. schemata (was Re: RDF in XHTML)
 - Re: RDF in XHTML
 - RE: Linking RDF
 - Common Metadata (was:RE: RDF in XHTML)
 - RE: RDF in XHTML
 - RE: good elevator pitch for Semantic Web
 - RE: good elevator pitch for Semantic Web
 - Call for Chapter Proposals
 - Re: Subject: good elevator pitch for Semantic Web
 - Subject: good elevator pitch for Semantic Web
 - Subject: good elevator pitch for Semantic Web
 
Thursday, 19 April 2001
- Re: RDF in XHTML
 - Re: RDF in XHTML
 - Re: RDF in XHTML
 - Re: RDF in XHTML
 - good elevator pitch for Semantic Web
 - Re: RDF in XHTML
 - Re: Linking RDF
 - RE: RDF in XHTML
 - Survey: RDF data stores
 - RE: Linking RDF
 - ContentType negotiation
 - RE: Semantic API
 - Re: RDF in XHTML
 - Re: Linking RDF
 - RE: RDF in XHTML
 - RE: RDF in XHTML
 - Re: Linking RDF
 - Re: Linking RDF
 - Re: Linking RDF
 - Re: Linking RDF
 - Re: Linking RDF
 - Re: Linking RDF
 - RE: Linking RDF
 
Wednesday, 18 April 2001
- Re: Linking RDF
 - RE: Linking RDF
 - Re: Linking RDF
 - RDF PNG Icon
 - Re: Linking RDF
 - Re: Linking RDF
 - Re: Linking RDF
 - RE: RDF from RDBMS
 - RE: RDF from RDBMS
 - RE: RDF in XHTML
 - RDF from RDBMS
 - RE: RDF in XHTML
 - RE: Metadata spoofing
 - Re: URIs / URLs
 - Re: RDF in XHTML
 - Re: RDF in XHTML
 - Re: RDF in XHTML
 - Re: RDF in XHTML
 - Re: URIs / URLs
 - Open Ph.D. Position - Knowledge Portals
 - RE: RDF in XHTML
 - RE: RDF in XHTML
 - Re: RDF in XHTML
 
Tuesday, 17 April 2001
Wednesday, 18 April 2001
Tuesday, 17 April 2001
- Re: RDF in XHTML
 - RE: Metadata spoofing
 - Re: RDF in XHTML
 - Re: RDF in XHTML
 - Re: RDF in XHTML
 - Re: RDF in XHTML
 - Re: RDF in XHTML
 - RE: Metadata spoofing
 - Re: RDF in XHTML
 - Re: RDF in XHTML
 - RE: RDF in XHTML
 - Linking RDF
 - Re: RDF in XHTML
 - RE: Semantic API
 - Re: Semantic API
 - RE: RDF in XHTML
 - Semantic API
 - RE: RDF in XHTML
 - Semantic API
 - Re: RDF in XHTML
 - Re: Can Resource be the top of our ontology ?
 - RE: RDF in XHTML
 - RE: RDF in XHTML
 
Monday, 16 April 2001
Tuesday, 17 April 2001
Monday, 16 April 2001
- Re: RDF in XHTML
 - Re: RDF in XHTML
 - Re: RDF in XHTML
 - RE: RDF in XHTML
 - Re: RDF in XHTML
 - Re: RDF in XHTML
 - Re: RDF in XHTML
 - Re: RDF in XHTML
 - Re: RDF in XHTML
 - Re: language and adoption
 - Re: RDF in XHTML
 - RE: language and adoption
 - Re: RDF in XHTML
 - Re: RDF in XHTML [was: Re: Authors describing what their URIs mean]
 - Re: language and adoption
 - RE: RDF in XHTML
 - Re: RDF in XHTML
 - RE: RDF in XHTML [was: Re: Authors describing what their URIs mean]
 - language and adoption
 - RE: RDF in XHTML
 - Re: RDF in XHTML
 - Re: RDF in XHTML [was: Re: Authors describing what their URIs mean]
 - RE: Metadata spoofing
 - Re: RDF in HTML (Was RDF in XHTML)
 - Re: Quoting triples: An RDF fragment identifier syntax
 - Re: Representing the Differences Between two Models
 - Re: Attributes and Namespaces.
 - Re: URIs / URLs
 - Metadata spoofing
 - Re: URIs / URLs
 - Re: Reification of Sets (of RDF Statement, for Queries)
 - RE: Zen & Chinwag
 - Re: RDF in XHTML [was: Re: Authors describing what their URIs mean]
 - Re: RDF in XHTML
 - RE: A Simple Analogy
 - Re: RDF in XHTML [was: Re: Authors describing what their URIs mean]
 - RE: RDF in XHTML [was: Re: Authors describing what their URIs mean]
 - Re: RDF in XHTML [was: Re: Authors describing what their URIs mean]
 - RE: Zen & Chinwag
 - RE: Zen & Chinwag
 - RE: A Simple Analogy
 - RE: Spec doesn't talk about two-valued relationships
 - Re: Zen & Chinwag
 - Re: RDF in HTML (Was RDF in XHTML)
 
Sunday, 15 April 2001
- Re: RDF in XHTML [was: Re: Authors describing what their URIs mean]
 - RE: A Simple Analogy
 - RE: RDF in HTML (Was RDF in XHTML)
 - RE: RDF in HTML
 - Re: Terminology for RDF Statement Sets
 - Re: Terminology for RDF Statement Sets
 - Re: URIs / URLs
 - Re: Spec doesn't talk about two-valued relationships
 - Re: RDF in XHTML [was: Re: Authors describing what their URIs mean]
 - RE: A Simple Analogy
 - RDF in XHTML [was: Re: Authors describing what their URIs mean]
 - RE: Sign Your Page in RDF (Quick Start Guide)
 - RE: Authors describing what their URIs mean
 - Re: Authors describing what their URIs mean
 - RE: A Simple Analogy
 - RE: Authors describing what their URIs mean
 - RE: Authors describing what their URIs mean
 
Saturday, 14 April 2001
- RE: A Simple Analogy
 - Crossposting to RDF lists, chat(ter) and IRC
 - RE: A Simple Analogy
 - Re: Authors describing what their URIs mean
 - RE: Authors describing what their URIs mean
 - RE: A Simple Analogy
 - RE: A Simple Analogy
 - Authors describing what their URIs mean
 - RE: A Simple Analogy
 - Re: Literal value
 - A Simple Analogy
 - Quoting triples: An RDF fragment identifier syntax
 
Friday, 13 April 2001
- Re: Reification of Sets (of RDF Statement, for Queries)
 - RE: Vance
 - Literal value
 - RE: Vance
 - Re: Vance
 - Re: Vance
 - RE: Vance
 - RE: Vance
 - Re: Vance
 - RE: Vance
 - Re: URIs / URLs
 - Re: What Name Should A Namespace Name?
 - Re: URIs / URLs
 - Vance
 - RE: Zen & Chinwag
 - Re: URIs / URLs
 - Re: Reification of Sets (of RDF Statement, for Queries)
 - Re: Terminology for RDF Statement Sets
 - Re: Reification of Sets (of RDF Statement, for Queries)
 - Re: Terminology for RDF Statement Sets
 - Re: URIs / URLs
 - RE: URIs / URLs
 - Zen & Chinwag
 - Re: URIs / URLs
 - Re: URIs / URLs
 - Re: URIs / URLs
 - Sci-Am scenario and RPP
 - RE: URIs / URLs
 
Thursday, 12 April 2001
- Re: URIs / URLs
 - Re: URIs / URLs
 - RE: URIs / URLs
 - RE: URIs / URLs
 - RE: URIs / URLs
 - RE: URIs / URLs
 - RE: URIs / URLs
 - Re: URIs / URLs
 - Re: URIs / URLs
 - Re: URIs / URLs
 - Re: Solutions to the Identification Problem, was Re: URIs / URLs
 - RE: URIs / URLs
 - Re: URIs / URLs
 - Re: Solutions to the Identification Problem, was Re: URIs / URLs
 - Re: URIs / URLs
 - Re: Can Resource be the top of our ontology ?
 - Re: What Name Should A Namespace Name?
 - Re: URIs / URLs
 - Re: URIs / URLs
 - First RDF binding proposal::IMS MD-Interoperability (fwd)
 - Re: Solutions to the Identification Problem, was Re: URIs / URLs
 - Re: URIs / URLs
 - RE: URIs / URLs
 - RE: URIs / URLs
 - RE: URIs / URLs
 - RE: URIs / URLs
 - Re: URIs / URLs
 - RE: URIs / URLs
 - RE: URIs / URLs
 - RE: URIs / URLs
 - Re: URIs / URLs
 - RE: URIs / URLs
 - RE: URIs / URLs
 - RE: URIs / URLs
 - RE: URIs / URLs
 - RE: URIs / URLs
 - RE: URIs / URLs
 - RE: URIs / URLs
 - Solutions to the Identification Problem, was Re: URIs / URLs
 - RE: URIs / URLs
 - RE: URIs / URLs
 - RE: URIs / URLs
 - RE: Can Resource be the top of our ontology ?
 - Re: What Name Should A Namespace Name?
 - RE: URIs / URLs
 - Re: URIs / URLs
 - Re: URIs / URLs
 - Re: URIs / URLs
 - Re: URIs / URLs
 - Re: URIs / URLs
 - Re: URIs / URLs
 - Re: URIs / URLs
 - Re: URIs / URLs
 - Re: URIs / URLs
 
Wednesday, 11 April 2001
- Re: URIs / URLs
 - Re: Qualified Cardinality
 - Re: URIs / URLs
 - Re: ANN: Semantic Web in SciAm
 - Re: ANN: Semantic Web in SciAm
 - ANN: Semantic Web in SciAm
 - Re: Can Resource be the top of our ontology ?
 - RE: schema repository?
 - Qualified Cardinality
 - RE: What Name Should A Namespace Name?
 - Re: What Name Should A Namespace Name?
 - Re: URIs / URLs
 - RE: What Name Should A Namespace Name?
 - What Name Should A Namespace Name?
 - RE: ANN : RDF Process Profile (RPP)
 - Re: ANN : RDF Process Profile (RPP)
 - Re: ANN : RDF Process Profile (RPP)
 - ANN : RDF Process Profile (RPP)
 - Re: An interesting problem in InfoSet
 - Re: schema repository?
 - RE: URIs / URLs
 - Re: Reification of Sets (of RDF Statement, for Queries)
 - RE: URIs / URLs
 - Re: URIs / URLs
 
Monday, 9 April 2001
Wednesday, 11 April 2001
Tuesday, 10 April 2001
- Re: URIs / URLs
 - RE: URIs / URLs
 - Re: URIs / URLs
 - Re: Reification of Sets (of RDF Statement, for Queries)
 - RDFCore Call for Participation is with AC reps
 - Re: URIs / URLs
 - Re: Reification of Sets (of RDF Statement, for Queries)
 - RE: Reification of Sets (of RDF Statement, for Queries)
 - RE: Reification of Sets (of RDF Statement, for Queries)
 - Re: URIs / URLs
 - RE: Reification of Sets (of RDF Statement, for Queries)
 - RE: Can Resource be the top of our ontology ?
 - Networked Knowledge Organization Systems, special issue of JoDI published
 - RE: Reification of Sets (of RDF Statement, for Queries)
 - Re: Reification of Sets (of RDF Statement, for Queries)
 - RE: Reification of Sets (of RDF Statement, for Queries)
 - RE: Can Resource be the top of our ontology ?
 - RE: Reification of Sets (of RDF Statement, for Queries)
 - RE: Can Resource be the top of our ontology ?
 - Re: eor.dublincore.org
 
Monday, 9 April 2001
- Reification of Sets (of RDF Statement, for Queries)
 - Terminology for RDF Statement Sets
 - RE: Can Resource be the top of our ontology ?
 - RE: Can Resource be the top of our ontology ?
 - RE: URIs / URLs
 - RE: URIs / URLs
 - RE: Can Resource be the top of our ontology ?
 - Re: URIs / URLs
 
Sunday, 8 April 2001
- RE: Can Resource be the top of our ontology ?
 - RE: Can Resource be the top of our ontology ?
 - Re: Can Resource be the top of our ontology ?
 - Re: Can Resource be the top of our ontology ?
 - Re: Can Resource be the top of our ontology ?
 - RE: Can Resource be the top of our ontology ?
 - Re: Can Resource be the top of our ontology ?
 - Re: eor.dublincore.org
 - RE: Can Resource be the top of our ontology ?
 - RE: Can Resource be the top of our ontology ?
 - Re: Can Resource be the top of our ontology ?
 - Can Resource be the top of our ontology ?
 - eor.dublincore.org
 - Re: URIs / URLs
 - schema repository?
 - Re: calendaring work
 
Saturday, 7 April 2001
Friday, 6 April 2001
- Re: URIs / URLs
 - Re: SWAG: Ann: Sign Your Page in RDF (Quick Start Guide)
 - Re: URIs / URLs
 - Ann: Sign Your Page in RDF (Quick Start Guide)
 - Re: URIs / URLs
 - Re: URIs / URLs
 - Re: URIs / URLs
 - RE: URIs / URLs
 - RE: URIs / URLs
 - CFP[ext. deadline]: International Semantic Web Workshop (Infrastructure and Applications for the Semantic Web)
 
Thursday, 5 April 2001
- Sesame RDFS Query & Storing service back online
 - Re: calendaring work
 - An interesting problem in InfoSet
 - URIs / URLs
 - Re: Dispositions of Dave Beckett's comments
 - Re: Dispositions of Dave Beckett's comments
 - Re: Comments on http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/WD-CCPP-struct-vocab-20010315/
 - RE: calendaring work
 - calendaring work
 
Tuesday, 3 April 2001
- Re: Comments on http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/WD-CCPP-struct-vocab-20010315/
 - RE: Dispositions of Dave Beckett's comments
 - RE: Dispositions of Dave Beckett's comments
 - Re: Dispositions of Dave Beckett's comments
 - RE: Dispositions of Dave Beckett's comments
 
Monday, 2 April 2001
- Re: Dispositions of Dave Beckett's comments
 - Re: Dispositions of Dave Beckett's comments
 - RE: Dispositions of Dave Beckett's comments
 - Re: Dispositions of Dave Beckett's comments
 - RE: Dispositions of Dave Beckett's comments
 - RE: Dispositions of Dave Beckett's comments
 - RE: Dispositions of Dave Beckett's comments
 - RE: Dispositions of Dave Beckett's comments
 - RE: Dispositions of Dave Beckett's comments
 - Re: Dispositions of Dave Beckett's comments