- From: Aaron Swartz <aswartz@swartzfam.com>
- Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2001 11:14:51 -0500
- To: "Sean B. Palmer" <sean@mysterylights.com>, SWAG <swag-dev@yahoogroups.com>
- CC: RDF Interest <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
Sean B. Palmer <sean@mysterylights.com> wrote: >> The answers to what's the resource at a namespace URI >> (a namespace) and what's the resource at data: URI (the >> content of the URI) seem to be mutually exclusive. > Using data: URIs for namespaces (which return data) seems no > better/worse to me than using HTTP URIs, which are also designed to > return data. I think the difference is that with HTTP, the spec makes it clear that you request a _resource_ from the server and the server attempts to send back the best representation it can. So if you request a namespace, you'll get back a description of a namespace. However, with the data: URI the only resource (AFAICT) involved is the data itself. Thus, it can never be a namespace, since it will always be a chunk of text (or an image, or whatever). (Unless we come up with a MIME type for namespaces.) -- [ Aaron Swartz | me@aaronsw.com | http://www.aaronsw.com ]
Received on Friday, 13 April 2001 12:15:02 UTC