W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-interest@w3.org > April 2001

RE: Linking RDF

From: Lee Jonas <lee.jonas@cakehouse.co.uk>
Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2001 13:04:13 +0100
Message-ID: <51ED29F31E20D411AAFD00105A4CD7A77102@zingiber.cakehouse.co.uk>
To: "'Brian McBride'" <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Cc: "'www-rdf-interest@w3.org'" <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
Brian McBride [mailto:bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com] wrote:

>Hi Lee,

Hi Brian!

>> Discussions on these issues seem to have died down, yet the issues have
>> been resolved and the new RDFCore working group are not even going to
>> address them.  
>There is an issue on the RDF Issues list:
>  http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfms-qname-uri-mapping
>Does this, together with the link to Perry's message cover the issues
>you'd like to see resolved, or are there other aspects you'd like to
>draw the WG's attention to?

The link to Perry's message covers one aspect, "weird, unwieldy namespaces
with different semantics to
other XML namespaces" - i.e. the deviation of namespace treatment in RDF
from its use in other XML technologies and the implied intent of the XML
Namespace spec (as stated in one of the appendices [1], IOW it was made
clearer *and* normative).

The two other issues were:

* "open grammar, which is harder to validate simply (and nigh on impossible
to do properly with DTDs)" - Syntax validation within the context of RDF
embedded in other XML grammars would be easier if the RDF syntax were only
of the 'Fixed-Schema' variety, see [2].  Currently, the propertyElt
construct, and abbreviated forms of RDF are of the 'Schema-follows-data'

* "resolution of RDF schemas clashes with resolution of XML schemas" - both
XML Schema and RDF Schema utilise namespace URIs to locate markup that
describes XML syntax rules and RDF model rules, respectively.  I am now
thinking this is not so much of an issue, as you could always use
content-negotiation to retrieve the type of schema you are looking for, and
there is another mechanism within RDF to state where to find a schema
description for a given resource (i.e. rdfs:isDefinedBy).

[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-xml-names#ns-expnames
[2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2001Apr/0346.html


PS, I for one find it very reassuring that the issues list is now being
actively maintained, keep up the good work!
Received on Monday, 23 April 2001 08:04:44 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:44:30 UTC