Re: Can Resource be the top of our ontology ? from Seth Russell on 2001-04-08 (www-rdf-interest@w3.org from April 2001)

From: Seth Russell <seth@robustai.net>
Date: Sun, 8 Apr 2001 13:45:42 -0700
To: "Charles F. Munat" <chas@munat.com>, "RDF-IG" <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
Message-ID: <001601c0c06c$e1b65dc0$b17ba8c0@c1457248a.sttls1.wa.home.com>

From: "Charles F. Munat" <chas@munat.com>

> So everything is a thing?

Every Class is a subClass of that which is named Thing.  

language: Semenglish
Seth
    (wants to discuss) Pentuples;
    (wants to collaborate on) SEM.
Pentuples
    see http://robustai.net/mentography/pentuples.gif ;
    comment "Are not meant as a replacement or extension of RDF";
    comment "Pentuples are a proposal for an internal data structure";
    (internal data structure of) SEM.
SEM
    label "Semantic Memory".

Received on Sunday, 8 April 2001 16:50:08 UTC