- From: Jonathan Borden <jborden@mediaone.net>
- Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2001 06:57:12 -0400
- To: "Aaron Swartz" <aswartz@swartzfam.com>, "Lee Jonas" <ljonas@acm.org>, "RDF Interest" <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
Aaron Swartz wrote: > > > Lee Jonas <ljonas@acm.org> wrote: > > > The suggestion is: one possible way to associate RDF metadata with a > > resource is via content negotiation - i.e. negotiate for the > 'text/rdf+xml' > > or 'application/rdf+xml' content type of a resource to get back an rdf > > document containing the resource's metadata. > > > > Is this a good idea, or just abuse of multiviews / typemaps? > > I'd think this would be acceptable, and is in fact what I plan to > implement > myself. I believe that the W3C has even published a NOTE which uses this > technique. > Acceptable to whom? Content negotiation as it is currently implemented and deployed is not acceptable to those people who don't have control over their ISP's server (that's alot of people). -Jonathan
Received on Monday, 23 April 2001 06:57:09 UTC