- From: Sean B. Palmer <sean@mysterylights.com>
- Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2001 17:51:17 +0100
- To: "Aaron Swartz" <aswartz@swartzfam.com>, "SWAG" <swag-dev@yahoogroups.com>
- Cc: "RDF Interest" <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
> The answers to what's the resource at a namespace URI > (a namespace) and what's the resource at data: URI (the > content of the URI) seem to be mutually exclusive. Using data: URIs for namespaces (which return data) seems no better/worse to me than using HTTP URIs, which are also designed to return data. In other words, so what if a data: URI is being used to represent a concept rather than some data: it is fine to do that with HTTP (or rather, it is a regular practice to...), so why not data: within certain contexts? It's a very controversial statement however, and I was just hacking around with ideas really. Cum grano salis. -- Kindest Regards, Sean B. Palmer @prefix : <http://webns.net/roughterms/> . :Sean :hasHomepage <http://purl.org/net/sbp/> .
Received on Thursday, 12 April 2001 12:51:29 UTC