- From: Jonathan Borden <jborden@mediaone.net>
- Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2001 09:01:19 -0400
- To: "Danny Ayers" <danny@panlanka.net>
- Cc: "RDF Interest" <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
Danny Ayers wrote: > > Of course I'm posting this before I've looked at the archives, but in the > RDF case won't the mimetype and URL will be enough? - shouldn't everything > within the file be fully qualified, so the grammar (purpose/nature) will be > indicated by the content & namespaces used within the RDF? > RDF doesn't have a media type at present. Regardless the nature: http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns# is unambiguously RDF. The purpose will depend on why the RDF document is being linked. Using a nature and purpose allows multiple RDF documents to be linked each having a different purpose (the purpose is an RDF predicate). -Jonathan
Received on Thursday, 19 April 2001 09:17:14 UTC