- From: Aaron Swartz <aswartz@swartzfam.com>
- Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2001 15:51:15 -0500
- To: Danny Ayers <danny@panlanka.net>, RDF Interest <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
Danny Ayers <danny@panlanka.net> wrote:
> Experimental engines that do stuff with the RDF could easily be rigged to
> recognise a link from rdf.png.
I'd actually prefer if we used a common REL attribute. I've heard
suggestions of "meta" and "rdf". This would also work with LINK elements
too. Then we could do something like this:
<a href="...rdfversion.rdf" rel="rdf">...</a>
We could also stick stuff in the head of the document:
<link rel="rdf" href=".../rdfversion.rdf" />
I'd like this much better than just guessing at rdf.png.
What do others think? Has this been decided before? Perhaps we should use a
URI?
rel="http://www.w3.org/RDF/"
Anyone?
--
[ Aaron Swartz | me@aaronsw.com | http://www.aaronsw.com ]
Received on Wednesday, 18 April 2001 16:52:00 UTC