RE: Vance

The controversy has begun!!!

BTW, Seth, as the originator of this term any definitions you come up with
will automatically be considered ill-conceived and inappropriate to the
users of the term - any historical fact you refer to regarding the term will
also be considered a refutable matter of opinion. See - you're on V. 1.1
already...

---
Danny Ayers
http://www.isacat.net

<- -----Original Message-----
<- From: Meltsner, Kenneth [mailto:Kenneth.Meltsner@ca.com]
<- Sent: 13 April 2001 23:02
<- To: Seth Russell; Danny Ayers; www-rdf-interest@w3.org; Ken MacLeod
<- Subject: RE: Vance
<-
<-
<- Oddly, I thought it was a reference to Jack Vance, a science
<- fiction noted for his tendency to use footnotes to explain
<- obscure alien and technical jargon.
<-
<- Ken Meltsner
<-

Received on Friday, 13 April 2001 13:11:34 UTC