- From: Danny Ayers <danny@panlanka.net>
- Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2001 01:07:37 +0600
- To: "Seth Russell" <seth@robustai.net>, <info@jan-winkler.de>, <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
<- Ok on that we agree. Some process needs to operate on the <- <conditional> to <- access the truth of the situation within some context before the value is <- known. Sure, we can represent any relation R(<conditional>, <value>) in <- RDF. But, me thinks, if we try to take the extra step of <- saying inside the <- RDF "if <conditional> then <value>", without also specifying at least the <- class of process, and the class of context in which that statement is <- operational, me thinks we are kidding ourselves. generally speaking, won't <conditional> and <value> have true/false values? In which case the context/processing is irrelevant - if the condition's true then so's the consequent... (what is done with this knowledge is another matter)
Received on Saturday, 28 April 2001 15:12:14 UTC