W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-interest@w3.org > April 2001


From: Joshua Allen <joshuaa@microsoft.com>
Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2001 15:15:17 -0700
Message-ID: <4F4182C71C1FDD4BA0937A7EB7B8B4C1D157F8@red-msg-08.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
To: "Sean B. Palmer" <sean@mysterylights.com>, "Seth Russell" <seth@robustai.net>, "Danny Ayers" <danny@panlanka.net>
Cc: "RDF Interest" <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
The FAQ doesn't really specify how RDF for a named fragment in a
document should look.  I would assume that the appropriate technique
would be to use something in the HEAD like:

<rdf:rdf ..namespace declarations..>
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="" ... /> (for the whole doc)
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="#frag1" ... />

Then have fragments wrapped in <a name="frag1">the fragment content</a>.

Make sense?
Received on Sunday, 15 April 2001 18:18:09 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:44:29 UTC