- From: Thomas G. Habing <thabing@uiuc.edu>
- Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2001 12:33:58 -0500
- To: Danny Ayers <danny@panlanka.net>
- CC: "Meltsner, Kenneth" <Kenneth.Meltsner@ca.com>, Seth Russell <seth@robustai.net>, www-rdf-interest@w3.org, Ken MacLeod <ken@bitsko.slc.ut.us>
No one would dare refute the OED :-) ---------------------------------------- Oxford English Dictionary - vaunce Copyright Oxford University Press vaunce, v. Obs. Also 4-6 vaunse, 6 vance. Etymology: Aphetic f. of advance v. To advance, in various senses. (Common in the 16th cent.) ----------------------------------------- Danny Ayers wrote: > > The controversy has begun!!! > > BTW, Seth, as the originator of this term any definitions you come up with > will automatically be considered ill-conceived and inappropriate to the > users of the term - any historical fact you refer to regarding the term will > also be considered a refutable matter of opinion. See - you're on V. 1.1 > already... > > --- > Danny Ayers > http://www.isacat.net > -- Thomas G. Habing Research Programmer, Digital Library Initiative University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign 052 Grainger Engineering Library, MC-274 thabing@uiuc.edu, (217) 244-7809
Received on Friday, 13 April 2001 13:34:21 UTC