RE: A Simple Analogy

<- AFAIK, WSDL has no semantics. Its intended for design time
<- binding, with a
<- programmer intervention, not for runtime binding.
<- I would think RDF will make UDDI and WSDL unnecessary.
<- Sateesh

Unnecessary maybe, but they're not likely to go away unless we see some RDF
'killer' implementations in the same space.

I really should get working on RPP...

Received on Monday, 16 April 2001 02:36:17 UTC