RE: A Simple Analogy

• From: Danny Ayers <danny@panlanka.net>
• Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2001 12:32:41 +0600
• To: "Narahari, Sateesh" <Sateesh_Narahari@jdedwards.com>, "'dehora'" <bill@dehora.fsnet.co.uk>
• Cc: "RDF-Interest" <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
• Message-ID: <EBEPLGMHCDOJJJPCFHEFEEDODCAA.danny@panlanka.net>

<- AFAIK, WSDL has no semantics. Its intended for design time
<- binding, with a
<- programmer intervention, not for runtime binding.
<-
<- I would think RDF will make UDDI and WSDL unnecessary.
<-
<- Sateesh


Unnecessary maybe, but they're not likely to go away unless we see some RDF
'killer' implementations in the same space.

I really should get working on RPP...

Received on Monday, 16 April 2001 02:36:17 UTC