- From: <jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com>
- Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2001 16:27:48 +0100
- To: danny@panlanka.net
- Cc: www-rdf-interest@w3.org, xml-dev@lists.xml.org
nice proposal! reading http://www.isacat.net/citnames/2001/04/rpp.htm#example ... <availability rdf:resource="#source"/> <in rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/2000/10/swap/log.n3#"/> <in rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/Notation3.html"/> <in rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"/> <implementationOf rdf:resource="http://www.agfa.com/w3c/euler/"/> ... is that so? anyhow, I better prepare myself to make an RPP resource ... -- Jos De Roo, AGFA http://www.agfa.com/w3c/jdroo/ danny@panlanka.net@INTERNET@w3.org on 04/11/2001 02:00:48 PM Sent by: www-rdf-interest-request@w3.org To: www-rdf-interest@w3.org@INTERNET, xml-dev@lists.xml.org@INTERNET cc: Subject: ANN : RDF Process Profile (RPP) RDF Process Profile (RPP) is a proposed lightweight extensible description format for processes. RPP is an XML application, conforms to the W3C's RDF Specification and is extensible via XML-namespace and/or RDF based modularization. I've put a mudman [1] specification together at [2]. There's still an awful long way to go both in terms of getting the idea in shape and modelling/expressing it properly. But I've just got an enormous pile of work-work in and so it'll be a good few weeks before I get chance to do any more on this, so I though this would be a good time to canvas for initial feedback. I've not got the RDF(S) syntax sussed, though I think there might be enough in the text of the doc to serve as a tidbit for the lions. Crit (that doesn't thoroughly demoralise!) will be appreciated. Oh yes, and I gave up smoking just before putting this together, so not only is the syntax extremely dubious, the overall sanity of the document is in no way guaranteed ;-) Cheers, Danny. [1] Like a strawman only squidgier [2] http://www.isacat.net/citnames/2001/04/rpp.htm --- Danny Ayers http://www.isacat.net
Received on Wednesday, 11 April 2001 10:28:18 UTC