W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-interest@w3.org > April 2001


From: Giosue Vitaglione <giosue@umich.edu>
Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2001 15:49:52 -0400 (EDT)
To: Lee Jonas <lee.jonas@cakehouse.co.uk>
cc: "'Charles McCathieNevile'" <charles@w3.org>, "'Aaron Swartz'" <aswartz@swartzfam.com>, RDF Interest <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>, RDF Logic <www-rdf-logic@w3.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.SOL.4.10.10104121535210.18792-100000@qix.gpcc.itd.umich.edu>
Hey folks. This thread is getting very big.
I would invite all of us to write only things 
that we know exactly, distinguishing between 
facts, hypothesis, questions or opinions.

PLease, let me add an important point:

RDF needs URI.
Subject, predicate and object are URI. (or literal, ok)
I like the way this is explained at:

URL are locators, we all agree.
URL are also URI, they identify the location.
URN are names. The identify something, they are URI.

I love the drawing at:

RFC2396 tells more about that.

Beside that, there is the discussion about 
how appropriate is to use URL as identifiers 
because locations change and re-assigned,
URI shouldn't.

I hope this helps the discussion.
Giosue' Vitaglione

On Thu, 12 Apr 2001, Lee Jonas wrote:
> > [...]
> >From what you say, use of URLs in RDF must be treated with extreme caution.
> Unless a publisher guarantees that they won't change the fundamental nature
> of the resource identified by a URL, you cannot rely on it to identify what
> you intend it to.  
> This seems like the most compelling argument for using URNs for identifying
> anything other than representation mappings yet!
> regards
> Lee
Received on Thursday, 12 April 2001 15:49:58 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:44:29 UTC