- From: Aaron Swartz <aswartz@swartzfam.com>
- Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2001 22:40:21 -0500
- To: "Narahari, Sateesh" <Sateesh_Narahari@jdedwards.com>, RDF Interest <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
Narahari, Sateesh <Sateesh_Narahari@jdedwards.com> wrote: > <mycompany:MethodInput> > <rdf:Bag> > <rdf:li resource="http://www.mycompany.com/businesslogic#Item"/> > <rdf:li resource="http://www.mycompany.com/businesslogic#Supplier"/> > <rdf:li resource="http://www.mycompany.com/businesslogic#ShipTo"/> > <rdf:li > resource="http://www.mycompany.com/businesslogic#DigitalSig"/> > </rdf:Bag> > </mycompany:MethodInput> > > <mycompany:MethodOutput> > <rdf:Bag> > <rdf:li resource="http://www.mycompany.com/businesslogic#OrderNo"/> > </rdf:Bag> > </mycompany:MethodOutput> This looks quite interesting, but it really depends on the context of the RDF. What it looks like you're missing is a Method resource to hold the input and output Bags together, so it should probably look like this (modulo namespaces): <rdf:RDF> <my:Method> <my:methodInput> <!-- note that properties start with a lower-case character --> <rdf:Bag> ... </rdf:Bag> </my:methodInput> <!-- repeat for output --> </my:Method> </rdf:RDF> A useful tool for finding these kinds of flaws is the online SiRPAC parser: http://www.w3.org/RDF/Implementations/SiRPAC/ Hope this helps, -- [ Aaron Swartz | me@aaronsw.com | http://www.aaronsw.com ]
Received on Tuesday, 24 April 2001 23:40:41 UTC