- From: Seth Russell <seth@robustai.net>
- Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2001 08:13:13 -0700
- To: "Lee Jonas" <lee.jonas@cakehouse.co.uk>, "RDF-IG" <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
- Cc: "Tim Berners-Lee" <timbl@w3.org>, "Guha" <guha@alpiri.com>, "pat hayes" <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>
From: "Lee Jonas" <lee.jonas@cakehouse.co.uk> > Although these all seem valid points, I think we are talking at > cross-purposes here. I am refering to the number of tuples generated by an > RDF parser, whereas you are refering to the number and size of records > stored. Both are valid concerns. I agree. Actually, in the external communications there ~should be no~ distinction, this should be left to the choice of the implementor of a internal data structure. To help make my decision (which is now wavering to identifying the statements) I made another mentograph to rebut Murray Altheim assertion that "There's no way torepresent the variability of one's relationship to the lily". You can see from digram [1] that there is not a whole lot of difference between the different tuple formats proposed. [1] http://robustai.net/mentography/TheLilyDone2Ways.gif > Yes, this is the crux, see my summary at the end of this mail. Thank you for that excellant summary. Seth
Received on Friday, 27 April 2001 11:17:06 UTC