- From: Danny Ayers <danny@panlanka.net>
- Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2001 23:25:48 +0600
- To: "Seth Russell" <seth@robustai.net>, <info@jan-winkler.de>, <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
<- Yes, you can certainly represent the mapping of the production <- rules in RDF. <- But, imho, you cannot say "if <class> then <value>" without specifying an <- agent and a method ... so that untill you do, that construct would always <- remain vague and useless. I'm not sure whether <class> and <value> would be the best candidates to go in such rules (what's the intention of <value>?), but something like "if <statement> then <statement>" isn't vague at all. Such constructs, like the rest of RDF and markup in general, only become useful when an agent (method?) acts upon them...
Received on Saturday, 28 April 2001 13:30:13 UTC