- From: Seth Russell <seth@robustai.net>
- Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2001 13:20:43 -0700
- To: "Sean B. Palmer" <sean@mysterylights.com>
- Cc: "RDF Interest" <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
From: "Sean B. Palmer" <sean@mysterylights.com> >What does make > sense is partitioning off applications of RDF, and embedding *them*. I > agree that limiting ourselves to just Dublin Core would be silly, but > it's a good a place to start as any. I don't think we would make any useful progress by doing this a schema at a time. If RDF takes off, we should be knee deep in schemas within a couple of years. We want to make it very easy to start using a new schema. Doesn't dan's suggestions in [1] point the way to avoid that? [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2001Apr/0245.html Let me see if I interperte it correctly: If I write the page http://robustai.net/something/samepageName.html I would could link my semantic description of the page with something like the following valid markup? <HEAD profile="http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/StandardProfile/ http://robustai.net/wierdProfile/"> <TITLE>How to complete Memorandum cover sheets</TITLE> <META name="author" content="Seth Russell"> <META name="keywords" content="something, anything, nothing"> <META name="date" content="1994-11-06T08:49:37+00:00"> <META name="authorDescibedRDF" content="http://robustai.net/something/samepageName.rdf"> <META name="authorDescibedN3" content="http://robustai.net/something/samepageName.n3"> <META name="authorDescibedSEM" content="http://robustai.net/something/samepageName.sem"> <META name="chiggy" content="something wierd that i just want to put here for my own purposes"> </HEAD> And that the "authorDescribedXXX" attribute names would have been defined as a standard for all to use and all agents to recognize, and my wierdProfile would define "chiggy" for my own purposes ? ... or did i get this all twisted around again ... Seth
Received on Monday, 16 April 2001 16:24:22 UTC