- From: Aaron Swartz <aswartz@swartzfam.com>
- Date: Mon, 02 Apr 2001 07:54:36 -0500
- To: <rdaniel@interwoven.com>, Dave Beckett <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>, RDF Interest <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
- CC: "'spec-comments'" <spec-comments@prismstandard.org>
Ron Daniel <rdaniel@interwoven.com> wrote: >> 4.8.3 >> Note that although a sequence of <dc:creator> elements in an >> RDF/XML file implicitly defines a sequence (in the XML world), RDF >> parsers have no obligation to preserve that ordering, unlike in an >> rdf:Seq. So the PRISM RDF profile requires that the ordering be >> preseved. > > Yes, good catch. I have added that suggestion to the profile. > > (Now I will have to add some stuff to my implementation to > keep track of that ordering.) Wait a sec... Are you explicitly adding something to PRISM that will make it incompatible will the rest of the RDF world? I may not understand the comment, and apologize if this is the case, but if I read it correctly, PRISM files using this special addition will be essentially unusable with a generic RDF processor. This would be a Bad Thing. -- [ Aaron Swartz | me@aaronsw.com | http://www.aaronsw.com ]
Received on Monday, 2 April 2001 09:55:08 UTC