- From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@dyomedea.com>
- Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2001 15:08:32 +0200
- To: RDF Interest <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
Aaron Swartz wrote:
>
> As raised in:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2001Apr/0427.html
>
> I'm unaware of how xml:base should be used in RDF. Are their any thoughts on
> this as an interoperability consideration, etc.?
Even if it's a non normative section, I have always been surprised to
see that RDF is one of the only specifications that hasn't been
mentioned as impacted in the xml:base specifications (it's a point I had
mentioned a while ago on xmlhack [1] and it's still true of the Proposed
Recommendation).
More important, I do think it would make sense to use it in RDF, but it
may require an update in the RDF specification to avoid inconsistent
behaviors.
Eric
[1] http://xmlhack.com/read.php?item=756
>
> What parsers implement this?
>
> Thanks for your help,
>
> --
> [ Aaron Swartz | me@aaronsw.com | http://www.aaronsw.com ]
--
See you in Hong Kong for www10:
http://www.www10.org/program/w10-half-tut.shtml#ta5
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eric van der Vlist http://xmlfr.org http://dyomedea.com
http://xsltunit.org http://4xt.org http://examplotron.org
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Friday, 27 April 2001 09:14:01 UTC