- From: William Loughborough <love26@gorge.net>
- Date: Sun, 08 Apr 2001 11:25:16 -0700
- To: "Seth Russell" <seth@robustai.net>, "RDF-IG" <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
At 11:07 AM 4/8/01 -0700, Seth Russell wrote:
>I don't see how to do this using the definition of Resource above
Nor do I. The territory/map thing isn't all because electrons are "things"
and their "parts" (quarks, etc.?) are only considered resources by absurdists.
The definition in the referred-to document is (how can I put this kindly?)
naive.
All resources are things, not all things are necessarily resources.
Of course ontology trees keep growing - probably faster than a ring a year?
--
Love.
ACCESSIBILITY IS RIGHT - NOT PRIVILEGE
Received on Sunday, 8 April 2001 14:24:51 UTC