- From: Joshua Allen <joshuaa@microsoft.com>
- Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2001 23:57:54 -0700
- To: "Danny Ayers" <danny@panlanka.net>, "RDF Interest" <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
>I don't think I agree with Seth's argument here - ignoring a spec is a >approach, whether or not the majority of browsers will accept it is another Well, when the XHTML validator tells me the page is incorrect because there is no such attribute as "xmlns:rdf" for the "rdf:RDF" element type, this tells me that there is something extremely naïve about that validator -- not that there is something wrong with my page. If my page is perfectly well-formed XML and renders in > 90% of browsers available today, that seems like it is doing much better than what XHTML1.0 can claim to do. This is something I opined about at http://scobleizer.manilasites.com/discuss/msgReader$78?mode=day.
Received on Sunday, 15 April 2001 02:58:35 UTC