RE: Authors describing what their URIs mean

>I don't think I agree with Seth's argument here - ignoring a spec is a 
>approach, whether or not the majority of browsers will accept it is
another

Well, when the XHTML validator tells me the page is incorrect because
there is no such attribute as "xmlns:rdf" for the "rdf:RDF" element
type, this tells me that there is something extremely naïve about that
validator -- not that there is something wrong with my page.  If my page
is perfectly well-formed XML and renders in > 90% of browsers available
today, that seems like it is doing much better than what XHTML1.0 can
claim to do.  This is something I opined about at
http://scobleizer.manilasites.com/discuss/msgReader$78?mode=day.

Received on Sunday, 15 April 2001 02:58:35 UTC