public-prov-wg@w3.org from April 2012 by date

Monday, 30 April 2012

Re: PROV-ISSUE-368 (no-responsibility-in-derivation): No responsibility in derivation [prov-dm] Timothy Lebo
Re: [owl changed] ISSUE-83: Express inverse relationships in Provenance Model as well as ontology Timothy Lebo
prov-o meeting agenda Timothy Lebo
Re: [prov-html] PROV-ISSUE-308 (prov-o-w3c-style): PROV-O HTML much conform to W3C Style [PROV-O HTML] Timothy Lebo
Re: PROV-ISSUE-370 (tracedTo-inference-only): Should tracedTo be moved to prov-constraints and be defined as a binary relation that can be inferred [prov-dm] Paul Groth
Re: PROV-ISSUE-370 (tracedTo-inference-only): Should tracedTo be moved to prov-constraints and be defined as a binary relation that can be inferred [prov-dm] James Cheney
Re: PROV-ISSUE-370 (tracedTo-inference-only): Should tracedTo be moved to prov-constraints and be defined as a binary relation that can be inferred [prov-dm] Paul Groth
Re: PROV-ISSUE-370 (tracedTo-inference-only): Should tracedTo be moved to prov-constraints and be defined as a binary relation that can be inferred [prov-dm] James Cheney
Re: PROV-ISSUE-370 (tracedTo-inference-only): Should tracedTo be moved to prov-constraints and be defined as a binary relation that can be inferred [prov-dm] Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-ISSUE-370 (tracedTo-inference-only): Should tracedTo be moved to prov-constraints and be defined as a binary relation that can be inferred [prov-dm] Paul Groth
Re: PROV-ISSUE-370 (tracedTo-inference-only): Should tracedTo be moved to prov-constraints and be defined as a binary relation that can be inferred [prov-dm] Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-ISSUE-370 (tracedTo-inference-only): Should tracedTo be moved to prov-constraints and be defined as a binary relation that can be inferred [prov-dm] Paul Groth
PROV-ISSUE-370 (tracedTo-inference-only): Should tracedTo be moved to prov-constraints and be defined as a binary relation that can be inferred [prov-dm] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
PROV-ISSUE-369 (drop-startByActivity): Should we drop wasStartedByActivity? [prov-dm] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
Re: PROV-ISSUE-368 (no-responsibility-in-derivation): No responsibility in derivation [prov-dm] Paul Groth
PROV-ISSUE-368 (no-responsibility-in-derivation): No responsibility in derivation [prov-dm] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
Special issue on Geoscience Data Provenance Paul Groth
Re: Fwd: Going for simplicity (was: actions related to collections) Paul Groth
Re: Problem accessing PROV-O documentation Luc Moreau
Re: Fwd: Going for simplicity (was: actions related to collections) Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-ISSUE-338: explain prov:agent vs. prov:hadPlan naming convention [PROV-O HTML] Stephan Zednik
Problem accessing PROV-O documentation Stephan Zednik

Sunday, 29 April 2012

Saturday, 28 April 2012

Re: Review prov-aq Olaf Hartig

Friday, 27 April 2012

Re: PROV-ISSUE-366: Approving agent in a qualified wasRevisionOf [Ontology] Paul Groth
Re: PROV-ISSUE-366: Approving agent in a qualified wasRevisionOf [Ontology] Stephan Zednik
Re: PROV-ISSUE-366: Approving agent in a qualified wasRevisionOf [Ontology] Paul Groth
Re: PROV-ISSUE-366: Approving agent in a qualified wasRevisionOf [Ontology] Timothy Lebo
Re: PROV-ISSUE-366: Approving agent in a qualified wasRevisionOf [Ontology] Stephan Zednik
Re: PROV-ISSUE-366: Approving agent in a qualified wasRevisionOf [Ontology] Stian Soiland-Reyes
Call for participation: SWPM 2012: The Third International Workshop on the role of Semantic Web in Provenance Management Paolo Missier

Thursday, 26 April 2012

prov-wg meeting minutes 2012-04-26 Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-ISSUE-340 (start-by-activity-is-comm): Start by Activity is Communication; drop it. [prov-dm] Timothy Lebo
Re: conforming prov-o to W3C style guidelines Timothy Lebo
Re: actions related to collections Graham Klyne
File:// URIs (was: Datatype property for used) Graham Klyne
conforming prov-o to W3C style guidelines Timothy Lebo
Re: revised prov-dm document (ISSUE-331) Timothy Lebo
Re: ACTION-70 Timothy Lebo
[owl changed] Re: PROV-ISSUE-367 (hadActivity-domain-and-comments-unclear): prov:hadActivity domain and usage unclear [Ontology] Timothy Lebo
Re: tracker down? Timothy Lebo
Re: PROV-ISSUE-367 (hadActivity-domain-and-comments-unclear): prov:hadActivity domain and usage unclear [Ontology] Stephan Zednik
[owl changed] Re: PROV-ISSUE-367 (hadActivity-domain-and-comments-unclear): prov:hadActivity domain and usage unclear [Ontology] Timothy Lebo
Re: PROV-ISSUE-367 (hadActivity-domain-and-comments-unclear): prov:hadActivity domain and usage unclear [Ontology] Timothy Lebo
Re: PROV-WG Telecon Agenda 26 Apr 2012 Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-O ready for internal WG review - due 9 April. Timothy Lebo
Re: Review prov-aq Graham Klyne
Changes applied to PROV-AQ in response to reviews Graham Klyne
Re: Review Prov-AQ document Graham Klyne
Re: Review prov-aq document Graham Klyne
Re: PROV-O ready for internal WG review - due 9 April. Ted Thibodeau Jr
tracker down? Timothy Lebo
[owl changed] Timothy Lebo
Re: PROV-ISSUE-222 (used-objectproperty): Datatype property for used? [Ontology] Jim McCusker
Re: actions related to collections Timothy Lebo
Re: actions related to collections Paolo Missier
Re: PROV-ISSUE-222 (used-objectproperty): Datatype property for used? [Ontology] Timothy Lebo
Re: PROV-ISSUE-357 (author-in-quotation): author in definition of quotation [prov-dm] Graham Klyne
Re: actions related to collections Graham Klyne
Re: PROV-ISSUE-331 (review-dm-wd5): issue to collect feedback on prov-dm wd5 [prov-dm] Graham Klyne
Re: PROV-ISSUE-222 (used-objectproperty): Datatype property for used? [Ontology] Graham Klyne
Re: PROV-ISSUE-311 (clarify-optionals): Clarify optional arguments in DM [prov-dm] Graham Klyne
Re: PROV-WG Telecon Agenda 26 Apr 2012 Olaf Hartig
Re: PROV-WG Telecon Agenda 26 Apr 2012 Tom De Nies

Wednesday, 25 April 2012

Re: revised prov-dm document (ISSUE-331) Luc Moreau

Thursday, 26 April 2012

PROV-ISSUE-367 (hadActivity-domain-and-comments-unclear): prov:hadActivity domain and usage unclear [Ontology] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker

Wednesday, 25 April 2012

PROV-ISSUE-366: Approving agent in a qualified wasRevisionOf [Ontology] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
Re: PROV-O ready for internal WG review - due 9 April. Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-ISSUE-365 (membership-as-insertion-too-limitting): Collection constraint membership-as-insertion too limitting [prov-dm-constraints] Paolo Missier
Re: actions related to collections Stian Soiland-Reyes
Re: actions related to collections Paolo Missier
Re: PROV-ISSUE-365 (membership-as-insertion-too-limitting): Collection constraint membership-as-insertion too limitting [prov-dm-constraints] Luc Moreau
Re: Collections: issue-136 and issue-137 Stian Soiland-Reyes
Re: PROV-ISSUE-136 (collection-functional): Collection not stated as functional [Data Model] Stian Soiland-Reyes
Re: PROV-ISSUE-137 (collection-isolation): Collection assertions does not guarantee isolation [Data Model] Stian Soiland-Reyes
Re: actions related to collections Stian Soiland-Reyes
Re: PROV-WG Telecon Agenda 26 Apr 2012 Tom De Nies
PROV-ISSUE-365 (membership-as-insertion-too-limitting): Collection constraint membership-as-insertion too limitting [prov-dm-constraints] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
PROV-ISSUE-364 (collection-constraints-bugs): Collection constraint has wrong syntax for memberOf [prov-dm-constraints] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
PROV-WG Telecon Agenda 26 Apr 2012 Luc Moreau

Tuesday, 24 April 2012

Monday, 23 April 2012

Re: Review Prov-AQ document Olaf Hartig
Review prov-aq document Curt Tilmes
Re: [prov-o] Examples Timothy Lebo
[owl changed] Re: PROV-O ready for internal WG review - due 9 April. Timothy Lebo
[prov-o] Examples Khalid Belhajjame
Re: actions related to collections Jun Zhao
Re: actions related to collections Paolo Missier
Re: PROV-ISSUE-356 (replace-hadquoter): Replace hadQuoter by reusing wasAttributedTo [mapping prov-dm <-> prov-o] Stian Soiland-Reyes
Re: PROV-O ready for internal WG review - due 9 April. Stian Soiland-Reyes
Re: PROV-O ready for internal WG review - due 9 April. Stian Soiland-Reyes

Sunday, 22 April 2012

Saturday, 21 April 2012

RE: actions related to collections Miles, Simon

Friday, 20 April 2012

Re: actions related to collections Paul Groth
Re: actions related to collections Luc Moreau
Re: actions related to collections Timothy Lebo
Re: Please help: prov-o examples Timothy Lebo
Re: actions related to collections Luc Moreau
Re: actions related to collections Luc Moreau
PROV-ISSUE-363 (prov-value-pun): prov:value punned on KeyValuePair and Entity's literal value [Ontology] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
Re: actions related to collections Paul Groth
Re: actions related to collections Timothy Lebo
Re: actions related to collections Paul Groth
Re: actions related to collections Timothy Lebo
Re: actions related to collections Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-ISSUE-341 (revision-approver): revision approver - why? [prov-dm] Timothy Lebo
Re: actions related to collections Timothy Lebo
[owl changed] Re: PROV-ISSUE-205 (optional-activity-in-generation-record): optional activity in generation record [prov-dm] Timothy Lebo
Review Prov-AQ document Sam Coppens
Re: revised prov-dm document (ISSUE-331) Timothy Lebo
PROV-ISSUE-362 (altOf-www): alternateOf is to handle levels of specificity, not the wild wild west of WWW URI selection [prov-dm] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
Re: PROV-O ready for internal WG review - due 9 April. Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-ISSUE-205 (optional-activity-in-generation-record): optional activity in generation record [prov-dm] Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-ISSUE-222 (used-objectproperty): Datatype property for used? [Ontology] Timothy Lebo
Re: actions related to collections Satya Sahoo
Re: PROV-O ready for internal WG review - due 9 April. Timothy Lebo
Re: PROV-ISSUE-205 (optional-activity-in-generation-record): optional activity in generation record [prov-dm] Timothy Lebo
Re: PROV-ISSUE-357 (author-in-quotation): author in definition of quotation [prov-dm] Paul Groth
[owl changed] Re: invalidation is in prov-dm Timothy Lebo
Re: PROV-ISSUE-357 (author-in-quotation): author in definition of quotation [prov-dm] Timothy Lebo
Re: PROV-ISSUE-357 (author-in-quotation): author in definition of quotation [prov-dm] Paul Groth
Re: PROV-ISSUE-357 (author-in-quotation): author in definition of quotation [prov-dm] Stephan Zednik
Re: PROV-ISSUE-357 (author-in-quotation): author in definition of quotation [prov-dm] Timothy Lebo
Re: PROV-ISSUE-357 (author-in-quotation): author in definition of quotation [prov-dm] Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-ISSUE-357 (author-in-quotation): author in definition of quotation [prov-dm] Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-ISSUE-356 (replace-hadquoter): Replace hadQuoter by reusing wasAttributedTo [mapping prov-dm <-> prov-o] Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-ISSUE-357 (author-in-quotation): author in definition of quotation [prov-dm] Daniel Garijo
Re: PROV-ISSUE-357 (author-in-quotation): author in definition of quotation [prov-dm] Stephan Zednik
Re: PROV-ISSUE-357 (author-in-quotation): author in definition of quotation [prov-dm] Timothy Lebo
Re: PROV-ISSUE-356 (replace-hadquoter): Replace hadQuoter by reusing wasAttributedTo [mapping prov-dm <-> prov-o] Timothy Lebo
Re: PROV-ISSUE-357 (author-in-quotation): author in definition of quotation [prov-dm] Luc Moreau
Re: actions related to collections Paolo Missier
Re: actions related to collections Paul Groth
Re: actions related to collections Paolo Missier
Re: PROV-ISSUE-357 (author-in-quotation): author in definition of quotation [prov-dm] Timothy Lebo
Re: actions related to collections Paolo Missier
Re: PROV-ISSUE-352 (rename-WasQuotedFrom): A better name for wasQuotedFrom [prov-dm] Paul Groth
Review prov-aq Olaf Hartig
Re: PROV-ISSUE-357 (author-in-quotation): author in definition of quotation [prov-dm] Paul Groth
PROV-ISSUE-361 (definition target-uri): no relationship between resource and provenance information in definition of target-uri [Accessing and Querying Provenance] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
PROV-ISSUE-360 (SPARQL example for 5.1.3): SPARQL example for obtaining provenance information directly [Accessing and Querying Provenance] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
Re: PROV-ISSUE-357 (author-in-quotation): author in definition of quotation [prov-dm] Luc Moreau
PROV-ISSUE-359 (provenance query service URI): Avoid the term "provenance query service URI" [Accessing and Querying Provenance] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
PROV-ISSUE-358 (web resource): Avoid using the term "Web resource" in PAQ [Accessing and Querying Provenance] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
Re: PROV-ISSUE-352 (rename-WasQuotedFrom): A better name for wasQuotedFrom [prov-dm] Daniel Garijo
Re: prov-aq issues resolved Olaf Hartig
Fwd: Please help: prov-o examples Paul Groth
Re: PROV-ISSUE-357 (author-in-quotation): author in definition of quotation [prov-dm] Paul Groth
prov-wg Telecon minutes April 19, 2012 Paul Groth
Re: PROV-ISSUE-356 (replace-hadquoter): Replace hadQuoter by reusing wasAttributedTo [mapping prov-dm <-> prov-o] Paul Groth
PROV-ISSUE-357 (author-in-quotation): author in definition of quotation [prov-dm] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
Re: PROV-ISSUE-352 (rename-WasQuotedFrom): A better name for wasQuotedFrom [prov-dm] Paul Groth
Re: invalidation is in prov-dm Paul Groth
Re: PROV-ISSUE-356 (replace-hadquoter): Replace hadQuoter by reusing wasAttributedTo [mapping prov-dm <-> prov-o] Stian Soiland-Reyes

Thursday, 19 April 2012

Re: PROV-ISSUE-205 (optional-activity-in-generation-record): optional activity in generation record [prov-dm] Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-ISSUE-204 (end-of-entity): What marks the end of an entity? [prov-dm] Luc Moreau
invalidation is in prov-dm Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-ISSUE-352 (rename-WasQuotedFrom): A better name for wasQuotedFrom [prov-dm] Daniel Garijo
Re: PROV-ISSUE-352 (rename-WasQuotedFrom): A better name for wasQuotedFrom [prov-dm] Timothy Lebo
Re: PROV-ISSUE-352 (rename-WasQuotedFrom): A better name for wasQuotedFrom [prov-dm] Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-ISSUE-352 (rename-WasQuotedFrom): A better name for wasQuotedFrom [prov-dm] Daniel Garijo
Re: actions related to collections Timothy Lebo
Re: PROV-ISSUE-352 (rename-WasQuotedFrom): A better name for wasQuotedFrom [prov-dm] Timothy Lebo
Re: PROV-ISSUE-352 (rename-WasQuotedFrom): A better name for wasQuotedFrom [prov-dm] Timothy Lebo
Re: PROV-ISSUE-352 (rename-WasQuotedFrom): A better name for wasQuotedFrom [prov-dm] Daniel Garijo
PROV-ISSUE-356 (replace-hadquoter): Replace hadQuoter by reusing wasAttributedTo [mapping prov-dm <-> prov-o] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
Re: PROV-ISSUE-352 (rename-WasQuotedFrom): A better name for wasQuotedFrom [prov-dm] Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-ISSUE-352 (rename-WasQuotedFrom): A better name for wasQuotedFrom [prov-dm] Daniel Garijo
Re: actions related to collections Satya Sahoo
Re: entity invalidation Luc Moreau
RE: actions related to collections Miles, Simon
Re: entity invalidation Ted Thibodeau Jr
Re: actions related to collections James Cheney
Re: actions related to collections Curt Tilmes
Re: actions related to collections Curt Tilmes
RE: Primer revised for release Miles, Simon
PROV-ISSUE-355 (convenient-notation-for-qualified-names): introduce a convenience notation for qualified names [prov-n] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
PROV-ISSUE-354 (all-or-nothing-for-optional-arguments): Adopt an all-or-nothing approach to optional positional arguments [prov-n] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
PROV-ISSUE-353 (optional-id-syntactic-marker): Introduce a syntactic marker for when optional id is expressed [prov-n] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
Re: Primer revised for release Luc Moreau
RE: entity invalidation Miles, Simon
Re: prov-wg: Telcon Agenda April 19, 2012 Graham Klyne
RE: Primer revised for release runnegar@isoc.org
Re: PROV-ISSUE-352 (rename-WasQuotedFrom): A better name for wasQuotedFrom [prov-dm] Luc Moreau
Re: actions related to collections Timothy Lebo
Re: PROV-ISSUE-320 (dgarijo): Change the name of prov:Quotation Daniel Garijo
Re: PROV-ISSUE-311 (clarify-optionals): Clarify optional arguments in DM [prov-dm] James Cheney
Re: PROV-ISSUE-311 (clarify-optionals): Clarify optional arguments in DM [prov-dm] Timothy Lebo
Re: PROV-ISSUE-311 (clarify-optionals): Clarify optional arguments in DM [prov-dm] Timothy Lebo
Re: PROV-ISSUE-311 (clarify-optionals): Clarify optional arguments in DM [prov-dm] Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-ISSUE-311 (clarify-optionals): Clarify optional arguments in DM [prov-dm] James Cheney
Primer revised for release Miles, Simon
PROV-ISSUE-352 (rename-WasQuotedFrom): A better name for wasQuotedFrom [prov-dm] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
Re: PROV-ISSUE-332 (review-prov-n-wd5): issue to collect feedback on prov-n wd5 [prov-n] Paolo Missier
Re: actions related to collections Jun Zhao
Re: PROV-ISSUE-351 (membership-complete): memberOf complete attribute missing [prov-dm] Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-ISSUE-311 (clarify-optionals): Clarify optional arguments in DM [prov-dm] Luc Moreau
PROV-ISSUE-351 (membership-complete): memberOf complete attribute missing [prov-dm] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
Re: PROV-ISSUE-311 (clarify-optionals): Clarify optional arguments in DM [prov-dm] James Cheney
Re: PROV-O ready for internal WG review - due 9 April. Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-O ready for internal WG review - due 9 April. Stian Soiland-Reyes
Re: PROV-O ready for internal WG review - due 9 April. Stian Soiland-Reyes
Re: actions related to collections Paolo Missier
Re: actions related to collections Luc Moreau
Re: actions related to collections Luc Moreau
Re: [owl changed] Re: prov-o html - for voting tomorrow Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-ISSUE-311 (clarify-optionals): Clarify optional arguments in DM [prov-dm] Luc Moreau

Wednesday, 18 April 2012

Re: PROV-ISSUE-311 (clarify-optionals): Clarify optional arguments in DM [prov-dm] James Cheney
[owl changed] Re: prov-o html - for voting tomorrow Timothy Lebo
Re: actions related to collections Stephan Zednik
Re: prov-o html - for voting tomorrow Luc Moreau
prov-o html - for voting tomorrow Timothy Lebo
Re: actions related to collections Luc Moreau
Re: actions related to collections Timothy Lebo
Re: actions related to collections Jun Zhao
Re: actions related to collections Luc Moreau
Re: actions related to collections Satya Sahoo
Re: actions related to collections Luc Moreau
Re: actions related to collections Luc Moreau
Re: actions related to collections Stephan Zednik
Re: actions related to collections Timothy Lebo
Re: actions related to collections Jim McCusker
Re: actions related to collections Jun Zhao
Re: actions related to collections Satya Sahoo
Re: PROV-ISSUE-250 (TLebo): respond to Eric's comments [Ontology] Eric
prov-wg F2F4 in Lyon? Paul Groth
Re: prov-wg: Telcon Agenda April 19, 2012 Jun Zhao
prov-wg: Telcon Agenda April 19, 2012 Paul Groth
Re: PROV-ISSUE-311 (clarify-optionals): Clarify optional arguments in DM [prov-dm] James Cheney
Re: PROV-O ready for internal WG review - due 9 April. Luc Moreau
Collections: issue-136 and issue-137 Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-ISSUE-207 (start and end records): start and end records [prov-dm] Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-ISSUE-311 (clarify-optionals): Clarify optional arguments in DM [prov-dm] Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-ISSUE-132 (YolandaGil): Improve the examples to make them more intuitive and of broader appeal in Provenance Data Model (PROV-DM) Draft [Data Model] Yolanda Gil

Tuesday, 17 April 2012

Monday, 16 April 2012

Re: PROV-ISSUE-123 (hadParticipant-subprops): prov:used and prov:wasControlledby should be subproperties of prov:hadParticipant Stian Soiland-Reyes
Re: PROV-ISSUE-314 (TLEBO): inconsistent comment location in PROV-O HTML cross referencing [PROV-O HTML] Stian Soiland-Reyes
css help - prov-o html Timothy Lebo
Re: PROV-ISSUE-222 (used-objectproperty): Datatype property for used? [Ontology] Paul Groth
Re: PROV-ISSUE-222 (used-objectproperty): Datatype property for used? [Ontology] Timothy Lebo
Re: PROV-ISSUE-222 (used-objectproperty): Datatype property for used? [Ontology] Paul Groth
[owl changed] Re: ISSUE-83: Express inverse relationships in Provenance Model as well as ontology Timothy Lebo
Re: PROV-ISSUE-314 (TLEBO): inconsistent comment location in PROV-O HTML cross referencing [PROV-O HTML] Timothy Lebo
Re: warning: hg merging Timothy Lebo
Re: PROV-ISSUE-320 (dgarijo): Change the name of prov:Quotation Timothy Lebo
Re: PROV-ISSUE-222 (used-objectproperty): Datatype property for used? [Ontology] Timothy Lebo
Re: PROV-ISSUE-222 (used-objectproperty): Datatype property for used? [Ontology] Stephan Zednik
Re: ACTION-70 Timothy Lebo
Re: prov-o meeting today Timothy Lebo
Re: PROV-ISSUE-222 (used-objectproperty): Datatype property for used? [Ontology] Timothy Lebo
Re: PROV-ISSUE-222 (used-objectproperty): Datatype property for used? [Ontology] Stian Soiland-Reyes
PROV-ISSUE-350 (xref-with-unions): cross references with union domains fail [PROV-O HTML] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
Re: PROV-ISSUE-222 (used-objectproperty): Datatype property for used? [Ontology] Timothy Lebo
ACTION-70 Luc Moreau
Re: [provo-html] PROV-ISSUE-119 (vanilla-rdf): How does vanilla RDF work with PROV Ontology [Formal Model] Paul Groth
Re: PROV-ISSUE-312 (TLEBO): acknowledge developers of tools used to create PROV-O HTML [PROV-O HTML] Jun Zhao
Re: PROV-ISSUE-222 (used-objectproperty): Datatype property for used? [Ontology] Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-ISSUE-117 (general-comments-on-formal-model-document): General Comments On Ontology Document [Formal Model] Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-ISSUE-312 (TLEBO): acknowledge developers of tools used to create PROV-O HTML [PROV-O HTML] Timothy Lebo
prov-o meeting today Timothy Lebo
Re: PROV-ISSUE-250 (TLebo): respond to Eric's comments [Ontology] Timothy Lebo
Re: PROV-ISSUE-128 (Location-Example): Location example uses a filesystem and not a geographical location [Ontology] Timothy Lebo
Re: PROV-ISSUE-117 (general-comments-on-formal-model-document): General Comments On Ontology Document [Formal Model] Timothy Lebo
Re: [provo-html] PROV-ISSUE-119 (vanilla-rdf): How does vanilla RDF work with PROV Ontology [Formal Model] Timothy Lebo
Re: PROV-ISSUE-222 (used-objectproperty): Datatype property for used? [Ontology] Timothy Lebo
RE: PROV-ISSUE-320 (dgarijo): Change the name of prov:Quotation Cresswell, Stephen
Re: PROV-ISSUE-337 (agent-and-entity): agent should not be a subclass of entity [prov-dm] Curt Tilmes
Re: PROV-ISSUE-337 (agent-and-entity): agent should not be a subclass of entity [prov-dm] Curt Tilmes
Re: PROV-ISSUE-337 (agent-and-entity): agent should not be a subclass of entity [prov-dm] Paul Groth
Re: PROV-ISSUE-337 (agent-and-entity): agent should not be a subclass of entity [prov-dm] Luc Moreau
warning: hg merging James Cheney

Sunday, 15 April 2012

Re: Different senses of specialization Timothy Lebo
Fwd: prov:specializationOf Jim McCusker
Please help: prov-o examples Timothy Lebo
PROV-ISSUE-349 (prov-o-html-egs): examples for each term in cross-reference section [PROV-O HTML] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
Re: PROV-ISSUE-337 (agent-and-entity): agent should not be a subclass of entity [prov-dm] Paul Groth
RE: PROV-ISSUE-337 (agent-and-entity): agent should not be a subclass of entity [prov-dm] Miles, Simon
Re: PROV-ISSUE-337 (agent-and-entity): agent should not be a subclass of entity [prov-dm] Curt Tilmes
RE: PROV-ISSUE-337 (agent-and-entity): agent should not be a subclass of entity [prov-dm] Miles, Simon
Re: PROV-ISSUE-337 (agent-and-entity): agent should not be a subclass of entity [prov-dm] Curt Tilmes
Re: PROV-ISSUE-337 (agent-and-entity): agent should not be a subclass of entity [prov-dm] Paul Groth

Saturday, 14 April 2012

Re: PROV-ISSUE-333 (review-prov-dm-constraints-wd5): issue to collect feedback on prov-dm-constraints wd5 [prov-dm-constraints] James Cheney
Re: PROV-ISSUE-347 (review-provo-luc): feedback from Luc on prov-o WD [prov-n] Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-ISSUE-347 (review-provo-luc): feedback from Luc on prov-o WD [prov-n] Jim McCusker
[owl changed] Timothy Lebo
Re: PROV-ISSUE-347 (review-provo-luc): feedback from Luc on prov-o WD [prov-n] Timothy Lebo
PROV-ISSUE-348 (prov-o-propery-name-conventions): maintain property naming conventions [Ontology] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker

Friday, 13 April 2012

Re: PROV-ISSUE-319 (dgarijo): Domain of hasAnnotation [Ontology] Timothy Lebo
Re: PROV-ISSUE-347 (review-provo-luc): feedback from Luc on prov-o WD [prov-n] Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-ISSUE-347 (review-provo-luc): feedback from Luc on prov-o WD [prov-n] Jun Zhao
PROV-ISSUE-347 (review-provo-luc): feedback from Luc on prov-o WD [prov-n] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
prov-wg meeting minutes 2012-04-12 Luc Moreau
RE: PROV-ISSUE-319 (dgarijo): Domain of hasAnnotation [Ontology] Miles, Simon

Thursday, 12 April 2012

actions related to collections Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-WG Telecon Agenda 12 Apr 2012 Olaf Hartig
Re: Different senses of specialization Jun Zhao
Re: Different senses of specialization Curt Tilmes
Re: PROV-WG Telecon Agenda 12 Apr 2012 Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-WG Telecon Agenda 12 Apr 2012 Olaf Hartig
Re: Different senses of specialization Tom De Nies
Re: Different senses of specialization James Cheney
Re: Different senses of specialization James Cheney
Re: Different senses of specialization Jun Zhao
Re: Different senses of specialization Graham Klyne
Re: Today's prov-o team telecon Paul Groth
Re: PROV-ISSUE-331 (review-dm-wd5): issue to collect feedback on prov-dm wd5 [prov-dm] Satya Sahoo
Re: PROV-ISSUE-332 (review-prov-n-wd5): issue to collect feedback on prov-n wd5 [prov-n] Timothy Lebo

Wednesday, 11 April 2012

Re: Different senses of specialization Timothy Lebo
Re: Today's prov-o team telecon Timothy Lebo
Re: Different senses of specialization Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-ISSUE-342 (location-of-usage): prov:location is an optional attribute of entity and activity - others okay? [prov-dm] Timothy Lebo
Re: Different senses of specialization Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-ISSUE-342 (location-of-usage): prov:location is an optional attribute of entity and activity - others okay? [prov-dm] Luc Moreau
Re: Today's prov-o team telecon Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-ISSUE-331 (review-dm-wd5): issue to collect feedback on prov-dm wd5 [prov-dm] Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-ISSUE-341 (revision-approver): revision approver - why? [prov-dm] Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-ISSUE-342 (location-of-usage): prov:location is an optional attribute of entity and activity - others okay? [prov-dm] Timothy Lebo
Re: PROV-ISSUE-341 (revision-approver): revision approver - why? [prov-dm] Timothy Lebo
Re: PROV-ISSUE-331 (review-dm-wd5): issue to collect feedback on prov-dm wd5 [prov-dm] Timothy Lebo
Re: Today's prov-o team telecon Timothy Lebo
Fwd: PROV-O: Review Sam Coppens Timothy Lebo
Re: PROV-ISSUE-333 (review-prov-dm-constraints-wd5): issue to collect feedback on prov-dm-constraints wd5 [prov-dm-constraints] Timothy Lebo
PROV-ISSUE-346 (distinguish-constraints): types of constraints unclear [prov-dm-constraints] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
PROV-ISSUE-345 (delineate-constraints): style hinders readability: constraints not separated clearly enough [prov-dm-constraints] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
PROV-ISSUE-344 (jzhao): Missing definitions of terms in section 4 Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
PROV-ISSUE-343 (account-objections): Objections regarding Account [prov-dm-constraints] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
Re: Different senses of specialization Graham Klyne
Re: PROV-ISSUE-331: feedback on PROV-Dm WD5 Luc Moreau
Re: Different senses of specialization James Cheney
PROV-WG Telecon Agenda 12 Apr 2012 Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-ISSUE-331: feedback on PROV-Dm WD5 Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-ISSUE-29 (mutual-iVP-of): can two bobs be mutually "IVP of" each other [Conceptual Model] Luc Moreau
Re: Different senses of specialization Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-ISSUE-331 (review-dm-wd5): issue to collect feedback on prov-dm wd5 [prov-dm] Luc Moreau
Re: Different senses of specialization Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-ISSUE-340 (start-by-activity-is-comm): Start by Activity is Communication; drop it. [prov-dm] Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-ISSUE-342 (location-of-usage): prov:location is an optional attribute of entity and activity - others okay? [prov-dm] Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-ISSUE-341 (revision-approver): revision approver - why? [prov-dm] Luc Moreau

Tuesday, 10 April 2012

Re: PROV-ISSUE-331 (review-dm-wd5): issue to collect feedback on prov-dm wd5 [prov-dm] Timothy Lebo
PROV-ISSUE-342 (location-of-usage): prov:location is an optional attribute of entity and activity - others okay? [prov-dm] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
PROV-ISSUE-341 (revision-approver): revision approver - why? [prov-dm] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
PROV-ISSUE-340 (start-by-activity-is-comm): Start by Activity is Communication; drop it. [prov-dm] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
Re: Today's prov-o team telecon Luc Moreau
RE: PROV-ISSUE-277 (TLebo): Supporting property chains [Ontology] Cresswell, Stephen
Re: PROV-ISSUE-332 (review-prov-n-wd5): issue to collect feedback on prov-n wd5 [prov-n] James Cheney
Re: PROV-ISSUE-277 (TLebo): Supporting property chains [Ontology] Graham Klyne
Re: PROV-ISSUE-332 (review-prov-n-wd5): issue to collect feedback on prov-n wd5 [prov-n] James Cheney
Re: release of prov-dm, prov-dm-constraints, and prov-n for review Khalid Belhajjame
RE: PROV-ISSUE-277 (TLebo): Supporting property chains [Ontology] Cresswell, Stephen

Monday, 9 April 2012

Re: PROV-ISSUE-333 (review-prov-dm-constraints-wd5): issue to collect feedback on prov-dm-constraints wd5 [prov-dm-constraints] James Cheney
Re: PROV-ISSUE-331 (review-dm-wd5): issue to collect feedback on prov-dm wd5 [prov-dm] James Cheney
Re: Different senses of specialization James Cheney
[owl changed] Daniel Garijo
Re: Today's prov-o team telecon Timothy Lebo
Re: Different senses of specialization Curt Tilmes
Re: PROV-ISSUE-339 (dgarijo): Domain of "activity" property [Ontology] Daniel Garijo
Re: PROV-ISSUE-339 (dgarijo): Domain of "activity" property [Ontology] Timothy Lebo
Re: PROV-ISSUE-226 (dgarijo): domain of the qualifiedDelegation property? [Ontology] Timothy Lebo
Different senses of specialization James Cheney
Re: Today's prov-o team telecon Timothy Lebo
Re: Today's prov-o team telecon Paolo Missier
Today's prov-o team telecon Timothy Lebo
PROV-ISSUE-339 (dgarijo): Domain of "activity" property [Ontology] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
Re: PROV-ISSUE-226 (dgarijo): domain of the qualifiedDelegation property? [Ontology] Daniel Garijo
Re: PROV-ISSUE-333 - feedback on PROV-CONSTRAINTS Paul Groth
PROV-ISSUE-338: explain prov:agent vs. prov:hadPlan naming convention [PROV-O HTML] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
Re: PROV-ISSUE-248 (string-as-entity): How to model strings? [Formal Semantics] Timothy Lebo
Re: PROV-ISSUE-226 (dgarijo): domain of the qualifiedDelegation property? [Ontology] Timothy Lebo
Re: release of prov-dm, prov-dm-constraints, and prov-n for review Khalid Belhajjame
Re: Primer WD2 ready for review Curt Tilmes
Re: PROV-ISSUE-331 release of prov-dm for review Curt Tilmes
Re: PROV-ISSUE-331: feedback on PROV-Dm WD5 Graham Klyne
TAG discussion may be relevant to PROV-CONSTRAINTS Graham Klyne
Re: PROV-ISSUE-331: feedback on PROV-Dm WD5 Paul Groth
Re: PROV-ISSUE-333 - feedback on PROV-CONSTRAINTS Graham Klyne

Sunday, 8 April 2012

Re: PROV-ISSUE-331: feedback on PROV-Dm WD5 Graham Klyne

Monday, 9 April 2012

Re: release of prov-dm, prov-dm-constraints, and prov-n for review Jun Zhao

Sunday, 8 April 2012

PROV-ISSUE-333 - feedback on PROV-CONSTRAINTS Graham Klyne
Re: ISSUE-83: Express inverse relationships in Provenance Model as well as ontology Daniel Garijo
Re: PROV-ISSUE-277 (TLebo): Supporting property chains [Ontology] Daniel Garijo
Re: PROV-ISSUE-317 (dgarijo): the domain of hadRole includes Derivation [Ontology] Daniel Garijo
Re: PROV-ISSUE-318 (dgarijo): Collections missing [Ontology] Daniel Garijo
Re: PROV-ISSUE-319 (dgarijo): Domain of hasAnnotation [Ontology] Daniel Garijo
Re: PROV-ISSUE-320 (dgarijo): Change the name of prov:Quotation Daniel Garijo
Review of PROV-O - ISSUE-336 Paul Groth
Re: PROV-ISSUE-331: feedback on PROV-Dm WD5 Paul Groth

Saturday, 7 April 2012

Re: PROV-ISSUE-331: feedback on PROV-Dm WD5 Graham Klyne

Friday, 6 April 2012

Re: PROV-ISSUE-331: feedback on PROV-Dm WD5 Paul Groth
PROV-ISSUE-331: feedback on PROV-Dm WD5 Graham Klyne

Thursday, 5 April 2012

Re: PROV-ISSUE-337 (agent-and-entity): agent should not be a subclass of entity [prov-dm] Curt Tilmes
prov-wg: Minutes of the 05 April 2012 Telecon Paul Groth
Re: PROV-ISSUE-331 release of prov-dm for review Curt Tilmes
addressing issues in prov-aq Paul Groth
prov-aq issues resolved Paul Groth
New PROV-AQ editor's draft available Paul Groth
Re: PROV-O ready for internal WG review - due 9 April. Stian Soiland-Reyes

Wednesday, 4 April 2012

Re: PROV-ISSUE-336 (provo-2WD-feedback): Incorporate WG feedback into PROV-O 2WD [Ontology] Timothy Lebo
RE: PROV-ISSUE-332 (review-prov-n-wd5): issue to collect feedback on prov-n wd5 [prov-n] Miles, Simon
RE: PROV-ISSUE-336 (provo-2WD-feedback): Incorporate WG feedback into PROV-O 2WD [Ontology] Miles, Simon
PROV-O issues pending review Daniel Garijo
Re: prov-wg: Telecon Agenda April 4, 2012 Daniel Garijo
prov-wg: note on sending reviews and comments on them Paul Groth
Re: PROV-O ready for internal WG review - due 9 April. Paul Groth
Re: PROV-O ready for internal WG review - due 9 April. Stian Soiland-Reyes
Re: PROV-O ready for internal WG review - due 9 April. Stian Soiland-Reyes
Re: Primer WD2 ready for review Paolo Missier
Re: Primer WD2 ready for review Paolo Missier
Re: Primer WD2 ready for review Paolo Missier
prov-wg: Telecon Agenda April 4, 2012 Paul Groth
Re: Primer WD2 ready for review Luc Moreau
RE: Primer WD2 ready for review Miles, Simon
Re: Primer WD2 ready for review Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-O ready for internal WG review - due 9 April. Luc Moreau

Tuesday, 3 April 2012

RE: PROV-ISSUE-336 (provo-2WD-feedback): Incorporate WG feedback into PROV-O 2WD [Ontology] Miles, Simon
Re: PROV-ISSUE-29 (mutual-iVP-of): can two bobs be mutually "IVP of" each other [Conceptual Model] Jim McCusker
Re: PROV-ISSUE-29 (mutual-iVP-of): can two bobs be mutually "IVP of" each other [Conceptual Model] Graham Klyne
Re: PROV-ISSUE-29 (mutual-iVP-of): can two bobs be mutually "IVP of" each other [Conceptual Model] Graham Klyne
Re: is specializationOf transitive or not? Graham Klyne
Re: Best practice for specialization Graham Klyne
RE: PROV-ISSUE-337 (agent-and-entity): agent should not be a subclass of entity [prov-dm] Miles, Simon
Re: PROV-ISSUE-223 (definition-of-entity): What is the definition of entity [prov-dm] Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-ISSUE-337 (agent-and-entity): agent should not be a subclass of entity [prov-dm] Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-O ready for internal WG review - due 9 April. Luc Moreau
RE: PROV-ISSUE-29 (mutual-iVP-of): can two bobs be mutually "IVP of" each other [Conceptual Model] Cresswell, Stephen
Re: PROV-ISSUE-29 (mutual-iVP-of): can two bobs be mutually "IVP of" each other [Conceptual Model] Paolo Missier
RE: PROV-ISSUE-337 (agent-and-entity): agent should not be a subclass of entity [prov-dm] Miles, Simon
RE: PROV-ISSUE-223 (definition-of-entity): What is the definition of entity [prov-dm] Miles, Simon
RE: PROV-ISSUE-337 (agent-and-entity): agent should not be a subclass of entity [prov-dm] Miles, Simon
Re: PROV-O ready for internal WG review - due 9 April. Paul Groth
Re: PROV-ISSUE-223 (definition-of-entity): What is the definition of entity [prov-dm] Paul Groth

Monday, 2 April 2012

Re: PROV-ISSUE-223 (definition-of-entity): What is the definition of entity [prov-dm] Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-ISSUE-223 (definition-of-entity): What is the definition of entity [prov-dm] Jim McCusker
PROV-ISSUE-337 (agent-and-entity): agent should not be a subclass of entity [prov-dm] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
Re: PROV-ISSUE-223 (definition-of-entity): What is the definition of entity [prov-dm] Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-ISSUE-29 (mutual-iVP-of): can two bobs be mutually "IVP of" each other [Conceptual Model] Jim McCusker
Re: PROV-ISSUE-29 (mutual-iVP-of): can two bobs be mutually "IVP of" each other [Conceptual Model] Luc Moreau
release of prov-dm, prov-dm-constraints, and prov-n for review Luc Moreau
PROV-O ready for internal WG review - due 9 April. Timothy Lebo
PROV-ISSUE-336 (provo-2WD-feedback): Incorporate WG feedback into PROV-O 2WD [Ontology] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
Re: PROV-ISSUE-29 (mutual-iVP-of): can two bobs be mutually "IVP of" each other [Conceptual Model] Jim McCusker
Re: PROV-ISSUE-29 (mutual-iVP-of): can two bobs be mutually "IVP of" each other [Conceptual Model] Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-ISSUE-29 (mutual-iVP-of): can two bobs be mutually "IVP of" each other [Conceptual Model] Jim McCusker
Re: PROV-ISSUE-335 (provo-html-code-style): use <code> and <a href="#Entity> consistently. [PROV-O HTML] Timothy Lebo
Re: PROV-ISSUE-29 (mutual-iVP-of): can two bobs be mutually "IVP of" each other [Conceptual Model] James Cheney
Re: PROV-ISSUE-29 (mutual-iVP-of): can two bobs be mutually "IVP of" each other [Conceptual Model] Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-ISSUE-29 (mutual-iVP-of): can two bobs be mutually "IVP of" each other [Conceptual Model] Jim McCusker
Re: PROV-ISSUE-29 (mutual-iVP-of): can two bobs be mutually "IVP of" each other [Conceptual Model] Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-ISSUE-29 (mutual-iVP-of): can two bobs be mutually "IVP of" each other [Conceptual Model] Timothy Lebo
Re: is specializationOf transitive or not? Deborah L. McGuinness
Re: PROV-ISSUE-242 (TLebo): generated twice? [prov-dm] Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-ISSUE-242 (TLebo): generated twice? [prov-dm] Timothy Lebo
Re: PROV-ISSUE-224 (unified-prov-namespace): Can we use a single namespace for the PROV family of specs? [prov-dm] Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-ISSUE-242 (TLebo): generated twice? [prov-dm] Luc Moreau
PROV-ISSUE-335 (provo-html-code-style): use <code> and <a href="#Entity> consistently. [PROV-O HTML] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
PROV-ISSUE-334 (define-qualification-pattern): Qualification Pattern was used, used in bold font in its first occurrence, but never defined. [PROV-O HTML] Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker
Re: PROV-ISSUE-311 (clarify-optionals): Clarify optional arguments in DM [prov-dm] Luc Moreau
Re: Best practice for specialization Tom De Nies
RE: is specializationOf transitive or not? Cresswell, Stephen
Re: Best practice for specialization Timothy Lebo
prov-o telecon 12 noon ET / 4pm GMT Timothy Lebo
Re: Best practice for specialization Curt Tilmes
Re: PROV-ISSUE-29 (mutual-iVP-of): can two bobs be mutually "IVP of" each other [Conceptual Model] Timothy Lebo
Re: PROV-ISSUE-29 (mutual-iVP-of): can two bobs be mutually "IVP of" each other [Conceptual Model] Timothy Lebo
Re: is specializationOf transitive or not? Tom De Nies
Re: PROV-ISSUE-29 (mutual-iVP-of): can two bobs be mutually "IVP of" each other [Conceptual Model] Timothy Lebo
Re: PROV-ISSUE-29 (mutual-iVP-of): can two bobs be mutually "IVP of" each other [Conceptual Model] Timothy Lebo
RE: PROV-ISSUE-29 (mutual-iVP-of): can two bobs be mutually "IVP of" each other [Conceptual Model] Miles, Simon
Re: is specializationOf transitive or not? Paolo Ncl
is specializationOf transitive or not? Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-ISSUE-29 (mutual-iVP-of): can two bobs be mutually "IVP of" each other [Conceptual Model] Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-ISSUE-29 (mutual-iVP-of): can two bobs be mutually "IVP of" each other [Conceptual Model] James Cheney
Re: PROV-ISSUE-29 (mutual-iVP-of): can two bobs be mutually "IVP of" each other [Conceptual Model] Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-ISSUE-29 (mutual-iVP-of): can two bobs be mutually "IVP of" each other [Conceptual Model] Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-ISSUE-29 (mutual-iVP-of): can two bobs be mutually "IVP of" each other [Conceptual Model] Tom De Nies
Re: Best practice for specialization Tom De Nies
Re: PROV-ISSUE-29 (mutual-iVP-of): can two bobs be mutually "IVP of" each other [Conceptual Model] James Cheney
Re: PROV-ISSUE-29 (mutual-iVP-of): can two bobs be mutually "IVP of" each other [Conceptual Model] Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-ISSUE-29 (mutual-iVP-of): can two bobs be mutually "IVP of" each other [Conceptual Model] Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-ISSUE-29 (mutual-iVP-of): can two bobs be mutually "IVP of" each other [Conceptual Model] Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-ISSUE-29 (mutual-iVP-of): can two bobs be mutually "IVP of" each other [Conceptual Model] Luc Moreau
Re: PROV-ISSUE-29 (mutual-iVP-of): can two bobs be mutually "IVP of" each other [Conceptual Model] Jim McCusker

Sunday, 1 April 2012

Last message date: Monday, 30 April 2012 19:28:40 UTC