- From: Satya Sahoo <satya.sahoo@case.edu>
- Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 12:35:46 -0400
- To: Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- Cc: Provenance Working Group WG <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAOMwk6wtwyf6jPhj6kpZ3W6v5ZOe1JrHSkmZmvoBAGZKXXEiVA@mail.gmail.com>
Hi all, The issue I had raised last week is that collection is an important provenance construct, but the assumption of only key-value pair based collection is too narrow and the relations derivedByInsertionFrom, Derivation-by-Removal are over specifications that are not required. I have collected the following examples for collection, which only require the definition of the collection in DM5 (collection of entities) and they don't have (a) a key-value structure, and (b) derivedByInsertionFrom, derivedByRemovalFrom relations are not needed: 1. Cell line is a collection of cells used in many biomedical experiments. The provenance of the cell line (as a collection) include, who submitted the cell line, what method was used to authenticate the cell line, when was the given cell line contaminated? The provenance of the cells in a cell line include, what is the source of the cells (e.g. organism)? 2. A patient cohort is a collection of patients satisfying some constraints for a research study. The provenance of the cohort include, what eligibility criteria were used to identify the cohort, when was the cohort identified? The provenance of the patients in a cohort may include their health provider etc. Hope this helps our discussion. Thanks. Best, Satya On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 5:06 PM, Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>wrote: > > Hi Jun and Satya, > > Following today's call, ACTION-76 [1] and ACTION-77 [2] were raised > against you, as we agreed. > > Cheers, > Luc > > [1] https://www.w3.org/2011/prov/**track/actions/76<https://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/actions/76> > [2] https://www.w3.org/2011/prov/**track/actions/77<https://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/actions/77> > >
Received on Wednesday, 18 April 2012 16:36:18 UTC