- From: James Cheney <jcheney@inf.ed.ac.uk>
- Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2012 15:04:10 +0100
- To: Provenance Working Group <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
I have revised the constraints document to address all minor/wording comments made on it in the reviews: http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/default/model/working-copy/wd5-prov-dm-constraints-revised.html Still unresolved: - all of Graham's review - points 3, 4, 12, 13, 18, 34, 35, 36, 38, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44 from Tim's review. (This includes all the remaining blocking issues.) - many points from my review which I will either try to resolve myself or raise as issues. I will be doing larger-scale reorganization next, so if there are any remaining comments/reviews of the document as currently structured, let me know ASAP so that it will be easier to apply the suggested changes. --James On Mar 29, 2012, at 2:41 PM, Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker wrote: > PROV-ISSUE-333 (review-prov-dm-constraints-wd5): issue to collect feedback on prov-dm-constraints wd5 [prov-dm-constraints] > > http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/333 > > Raised by: Luc Moreau > On product: prov-dm-constraints > > When sending feedback on prov-dm-constraints (wd5), please send it under this issue or individual new issues. > > > > > -- The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in Scotland, with registration number SC005336.
Received on Saturday, 14 April 2012 14:04:52 UTC