- From: Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu>
- Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2012 13:27:28 -0400
- To: Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- Cc: Provenance Working Group WG <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
Thanks, Luc. We'll leave 268 open as we consider this option. Regards, Tim On Apr 16, 2012, at 11:21 AM, Luc Moreau wrote: > > Hi prov-o team, > > ISSUE-84, ISSUE-262, and ISSUE-263 can be closed. They are addressed by the current document. > > Regarding ISSUE-268, irrespective of the two-level ontology suggested originally, it would be > good to decide whether there will be an attempt to define constraints (such as in prov-dm-constraints) in > a separate ontology (or even the current one, if it's feasible) or in some form of rule language, or other. > > Cheers, > Luc > > -- > Professor Luc Moreau > Electronics and Computer Science tel: +44 23 8059 4487 > University of Southampton fax: +44 23 8059 2865 > Southampton SO17 1BJ email: l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk > United Kingdom http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~lavm > > >
Received on Monday, 16 April 2012 17:28:03 UTC