- From: Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2012 16:44:43 +0100
- To: Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu>
- CC: Provenance Working Group <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
Hi Tim, The latest draft contains the change. I am closing this issue, pending review. Luc On 04/11/2012 11:54 PM, Timothy Lebo wrote: > Luc, > > > On Apr 11, 2012, at 5:56 PM, Luc Moreau wrote: > > >> Hi Tim, >> >> My understanding of the location attribute is restrictive. >> This is how I also specified the current XML schema. >> > Okay. > > >> I also think it's inline with our way of handling time. E.g. We said we didn't want prov:time on entity. >> >> Thoughts? >> > So does restating "The attribute prov:location is an optional attribute of entity and activity" to > "The attribute prov:location is an optional attribute of entity, activity, usage, and generation." > > sound reasonable? If so, I think it would address this issue and we can close it. > > Regards, > Tim > > > > >> Professor Luc Moreau >> Electronics and Computer Science >> University of Southampton >> Southampton SO17 1BJ >> United Kingdom >> >> On 11 Apr 2012, at 20:47, "Timothy Lebo"<lebot@rpi.edu> wrote: >> >> >>> Luc, >>> >>> >>> On Apr 11, 2012, at 12:30 AM, Luc Moreau wrote: >>> >>> >>>> Hi Tim, >>>> >>>> I don't think there has been suggestion that the location attribute applies to other classes. You are making a good case for usage and generation. >>>> >>> Thanks. >>> >>> >>>> What else? >>>> >>> I would be happy with just adding Usage and Generation. It covers the cases that I can think of. >>> >>> >>>> Everything? Note sure this works for Quotation, OriginalSource, Attribution, Association, Responsibility …. >>>> >>> None of these make sense upon a cursory consideration. >>> >>> >>> >>> However, part of my question was: >>> >>> >>>>> Is it acceptable to view the DM's current statement as non-restrictive? >>>>> >>> So, even if you do add Usage and Generation to the list with Entitiy and Activity, can someone conformant-ly put a location on something else? >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Tim >>> >>> >>> >>>> >>>> Professor Luc Moreau >>>> Electronics and Computer Science >>>> University of Southampton >>>> Southampton SO17 1BJ >>>> United Kingdom >>>> >>>> On 10 Apr 2012, at 22:58, "Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker"<sysbot+tracker@w3.org> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>> PROV-ISSUE-342 (location-of-usage): prov:location is an optional attribute of entity and activity - others okay? [prov-dm] >>>>> >>>>> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/342 >>>>> >>>>> Raised by: Timothy Lebo >>>>> On product: prov-dm >>>>> >>>>> 4.7.4.2 prov:location >>>>> >>>>> states: >>>>> >>>>> "The attribute prov:location is an optional attribute of entity and activity." >>>>> >>>>> does this imply that it is NOT an attribute of any other class? >>>>> >>>>> I imagine that it might be useful to specify the location of a usage, which would be more specific than the location of the using activity. e.g., "The party happened at Sarah's. The cake was cut with a knife in the kitchen." To mention "kitchen" for the usage, prov:location seems natural. >>>>> >>>>> Is it acceptable to view the DM's current statement as non-restrictive? >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> Tim >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >> > -- Professor Luc Moreau Electronics and Computer Science tel: +44 23 8059 4487 University of Southampton fax: +44 23 8059 2865 Southampton SO17 1BJ email: l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk United Kingdom http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~lavm
Received on Tuesday, 17 April 2012 15:45:49 UTC