- From: Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2012 09:42:38 +0000
- To: Paul Groth <p.t.groth@vu.nl>
- CC: Provenance Working Group <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
Ok, but how can we enforce it? What does it mean to be "other" in a PROV context? Do we need validity rules? Professor Luc Moreau Electronics and Computer Science University of Southampton Southampton SO17 1BJ United Kingdom On 20 Apr 2012, at 09:06, "Paul Groth" <p.t.groth@vu.nl> wrote: > Hi Luc, > > Err.. I took the definition of quotation directly from the dictionary :-) > > So you'd have to argue with them. > > cheers > Paul > > On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 9:03 AM, Provenance Working Group Issue > Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org> wrote: >> PROV-ISSUE-357 (author-in-quotation): author in definition of quotation [prov-dm] >> >> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/357 >> >> Raised by: Luc Moreau >> On product: prov-dm >> >> >> The definition of Quotation [1] is: >> >> A quotation is the repeat of (some or all of) an entity, such as text or image, by someone other than its original author. >> >> Do we really mean that I wouldn't be entitled to quote myself? If it's the case, what does it mean to be "someone other than the original author"? are alternates OK? >> >> http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/default/model/prov-dm.html#concept-quotation >> >> >> >> >> > > > > -- > -- > Dr. Paul Groth (p.t.groth@vu.nl) > http://www.few.vu.nl/~pgroth/ > Assistant Professor > Knowledge Representation & Reasoning Group > Artificial Intelligence Section > Department of Computer Science > VU University Amsterdam >
Received on Friday, 20 April 2012 09:43:10 UTC