Re: PROV-ISSUE-29 (mutual-iVP-of): can two bobs be mutually "IVP of" each other [Conceptual Model] from Timothy Lebo on 2012-04-02 (public-prov-wg@w3.org from April 2012)

From: Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu>
Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2012 12:59:53 -0400
To: Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
Cc: Stian Soiland-Reyes <soiland-reyes@cs.manchester.ac.uk>, Paul Groth <p.t.groth@vu.nl>, James Cheney <jcheney@inf.ed.ac.uk>, "public-prov-wg@w3.org" <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <7F932F50-9CFF-483F-A2FB-F40E97C88328@rpi.edu>

On Apr 2, 2012, at 1:38 AM, Luc Moreau wrote:

> 
> Stian,
> What do you mean?
> 
> On 2 Apr 2012, at 00:11, "Stian Soiland-Reyes" <soiland-reyes@cs.manchester.ac.uk> wrote:
> 
>> however you often find
>> derivation and specialization go hand in hand

Yes, but they are not equivalent.

:b prov:wasDerivedBy :a

may indicate that:

:b prov:alternateOf :a 

for some types of derivation.

One may have alternates that are not derivations of one another.

-Tim

Received on Monday, 2 April 2012 17:00:47 UTC