- From: Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 09 Apr 2012 13:55:35 +0000
- To: public-prov-wg@w3.org
PROV-ISSUE-338: explain prov:agent vs. prov:hadPlan naming convention [PROV-O HTML]
http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/338
Raised by: Timothy Lebo
On product: PROV-O HTML
http://www.w3.org/mid/EMEW3|2c084c78f3361c61dff318d0c8aad9d6o339EE08L.Moreau|ecs.soton.ac.uk|4F7C02D3.7090705@ecs.soton.ac.uk
Hi prov-o team,
Just one more thoughts that came up when reading the primer.
Looking at the following snippet:
ex:correct prov:qualifiedAssociation [
a Association ;
prov:agent ex:edith ;
prov:hadPlan ex:corrections
] .
it is strange to see prov:hasPlan, why not simply prov:plan (and similarly
for other hadXXX properties).
Cheers,
Luc
Received on Monday, 9 April 2012 13:55:42 UTC