- From: Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2012 14:57:16 +0000
- To: Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu>
- CC: Stian Soiland-Reyes <soiland-reyes@cs.manchester.ac.uk>, "public-prov-wg@w3.org" <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
I don't think they now have anything to do with agent/attribution. Professor Luc Moreau Electronics and Computer Science University of Southampton Southampton SO17 1BJ United Kingdom On 20 Apr 2012, at 15:25, "Timothy Lebo" <lebot@rpi.edu> wrote: > Shouldn't wasEndedBy and wasStartedBy be sub properties of wasAttributedTo? > > > I think this also brings up a more general question, Stian. > With the ease of "toggling" properties around the hierarchy, it would be nice to have owl:Annotations that justify why one is a sub prop of another, referencing the appropriate dm or dm-constraints anchors. > > Any interest in trying that out? > > Thanks, > Tim > > On Apr 19, 2012, at 4:56 AM, Luc Moreau wrote: > >> >> >> On 04/19/2012 09:49 AM, Stian Soiland-Reyes wrote: >>> Seems Tim beat me too it.. but now the question are of the unqualified >>> properties. >>> >> yes, he sent a message last night. >>> They are currently subproperties of prov:wasAssociatedWith (range >>> prov:Agent) - but I no longer read that understanding from DM. >>> >>> >> Correct, no agent any more. It's start/end are part of component 1, whereas agent is in component 3. >> >>> So I've made them as well be simple subproperties of prov:involved >>> with range prov:Entity. I'm also checking the ProvRDF page. >>> >>> >> >> I think that would be right. >>> Luc, just to check as there are currently a bit of a mess of versions >>> of DM in Mercurial, [1] is right? >>> >> >> Yes, that's the latest, ... and right as far as I can tell ;-) >> Luc >> >>> [1] http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/default/model/prov-dm.html#dfn-wasstartedby >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 09:33, Stian Soiland-Reyes >>> <soiland-reyes@cs.manchester.ac.uk> wrote: >>> >>>> You are absolutely right. I'll fix that. >>>> >>>> On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 08:52, Luc Moreau<L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi prov-o team, >>>>> >>>>> I don't know whether this is something that changed since our reviews, or >>>>> whether I missed it in my review, >>>>> but prov:Start and prov:End should be EntityInvolvement and not >>>>> AgentInvolvement. >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> Luc >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 04/02/2012 09:12 PM, Timothy Lebo wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Luc, Paul, Simon, Sam, and MacTed, >>>>>> >>>>>> Over the past couple telecons, you have accepted to review and provide >>>>>> feedback for the PROV-O documents. >>>>>> >>>>>> Please see ISSUE-336 for the information about reviewing PROV-O HTML and >>>>>> OWL. >>>>>> >>>>>> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/336 >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> If you could reply to this message when providing feedback, we would >>>>>> greatly appreciate it. >>>>>> >>>>>> Regards, >>>>>> >>>>>> <Tim Lebo> >>>>>> prov:actedOnBehalfOf<PROV-O team>; >>>>>> . >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Professor Luc Moreau >>>>> Electronics and Computer Science tel: +44 23 8059 4487 >>>>> University of Southampton fax: +44 23 8059 2865 >>>>> Southampton SO17 1BJ email: l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk >>>>> United Kingdom http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~lavm >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Stian Soiland-Reyes, myGrid team >>>> School of Computer Science >>>> The University of Manchester >>>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> -- >> Professor Luc Moreau >> Electronics and Computer Science tel: +44 23 8059 4487 >> University of Southampton fax: +44 23 8059 2865 >> Southampton SO17 1BJ email: l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk >> United Kingdom http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~lavm >> >> >> >
Received on Friday, 20 April 2012 14:57:53 UTC