Re: actions related to collections

On 04/19/2012 10:35 AM, Curt Tilmes wrote:
> Take what we have here, make it a Collection Provenance Model or
> something like that, and propose it separately as a middle layer on
> top of PROV, below all the "Provenance of XXX"s that will be needed
> for various domains, but leave it out of PROV-DM.

To clarify: I'm not questioning whether or not collections are
important (they are) or whether or not we need standard ways of
handling them (we do).

I'm simply questioning whether PROV-DM is the right place to do that,
and whether the complexity they add to the fundamental data model is
worth the benefit of specifying them here.


Received on Thursday, 19 April 2012 14:48:55 UTC